Search results

I'm colorblind so... :dunno

I assume you are happy not getting what you paid for? You just like to give up your money and then bow down at the feet of the company that took it? Thanking them for allowing you to pay? I'd rather demand that I get what I pay for. If that's entitlement, then you're ******* right I am...

Great. Thanks.

Awesome. And you've made a fantastic toy, with this one exception. Now can you answer this - because it is important. Will you release the hats in some way that people can acquire them from you without making another, unrelated, purchase. Just a "yes" or "no" would be great.

Blocked. Bye.

But there's no reason they can't do both. That's what I have been saying from the start. Yes, the people who think (correctly, but unrealistically) they should just get it for mailed to them for free will be mad and feel left out. Maybe. But those people are left out now. Nothing changes in that...

Everything you are saying is true. Which is why Asmus loses nothing by offering the hat up as an individual item for sale. But they refuse to do that, because supposedly doing so will make people angry. :/

This isn't about our individual interpretations. The company has spelled it all out for us. For them, "giveaway" means "with purchase". That's it. They have said this. Clearly. And if you are saying that the delivery of this hat is a "favor", I wholeheartedly disagree. They failed to deliver on...

LOL. There is a deep and amusing irony that someone with a "Restore the Snyderverse" icon in their profile - a movement founded on loudly demanding that a corporation fix a broken product - is calling me a "manbaby" for - (checks notes) - asking a corporation to fix a broken product. That...

You understand that this isn't a matter of what "I" think, right? They have stated that "giveaway" means "with purchase". Repeatedly. Again: We cannot mail to all the buyers, because shipping has been a problem to us since the pandemic, it will cost more than 20 dollars to just ship one hat to...

"Giveaway" in this context, means "with purchase". That's not a debatable point. They have made this clear. What you think it means doesn't affect what they have actually said. If they don't hear from customers that their solution is not workable or acceptable for all who purchased their...

They said they have delayed that to accommodate an updated set of eyes.

I read every post they wrote. I gave you exact quotes (including one from a deleted post they made). The post you are citing does not say that the hat will be distributed without purchase. When they say "giveaway" they mean WITH purchase. That's clear. Asmus is active on this thread. All they...

Here's what Asmus said to this issue. "We tried to give away items like this to the distributors or dealers before, unfortunately, it happens from time to time, the item will be "lost" before reaching to the collectors. We cannot mail to all the buyers, because shipping has been a problem to...

Your opinion is irrelevant.

Hey I'd love to be wrong. But I just went back and double checked and I don't see Asmus saying that they will make the hat available without a purchase. Can you quote the post? Or give me the post number so I can check it out?

If this were all happening in a diner… CUSTOMER 1: Excuse me… I ordered a hamburger. But the bun on this burger… RESTAURANT: Yes? CUSTOMER 1: It’s made of cardboard. RESTAURANT: Ah yes. We had a problem in the kitchen and unfortunately the hamburger buns did not come out as we hoped...

A problem with deterioration a year after purchase is a reason to not purchase from the company anymore. An expensive item arriving and not matching what was advertised is also a reason not to purchase anymore. The issue is that Asmus is halfway to making this right. They see the problem...

This isn’t true at all. Asmus has only made it clear that they will not provide the hat without shipping with a seperate purchase. They clearly said that selling hats individually was not an option (because it will make people “angry”). You and others have defended this decision by proclaiming...

I worked for a 6th scale toy company for several years, so I’m not exactly new to this. There is a line between product changes and something being absolutely unviable. You don’t have this toy, right?