Search results

If you really think about the product description for every Baleman produced by HT thus far, how EVERY version has been ‘meticulously, fine detailed-ly, painstakingly’ captured to ‘accurately’ capture this and so feature…Bale’s likeness, his muscular physique… And now this newER version is even...

What are you talking bout? I took those from MRC’s review!! 😜🤪😜🤪

Here are some screen caps from MRC’s review: 😇😇😇😇 MRC’s video doesn’t show me what i haven’t already seen with those blogger photos. Just different lighting and it’s in motion. It doesn’t magically bring out the Rupaul-…I mean SLJ likeness.

…I…don’t agree. It actually makes it looks worse, accentuating the lack of SLJ likeness. Once again, if you’re getting this because you really want ‘Mace’ in your collection, cool. but nothing will ever convince me this looks like the actor it’s based off of.

But if they were so lazy and couldn’t be arsed to sculpt another SLJ, they could’ve taken one of their fury sculpts and repurposed it for a mace sculpt. Sure it would’ve been a recycle, but at least it would’ve looked like SLJ.

I’d only want InArt To get some form of partial license just to put even more of the squeeze on HT. HT may have improved their sculpts (prototypes) this past year, but they still can’t break out of their bad habits. Outsourcing or straight up purchasing already existing sculpts to remain...

This popped up on OSR FB group 😂😂 Don’t worry, HT will most definitely probably theoretically MAYBE have the definitive version of this Batman…once they revisit him 2 more times…then! THEN, he’ll look perfect!

I think Mace’s outfit didn’t change at all in the PT.

Sixth times the char- Eh…maybe they’ll get it even more right-er with the 7th version right fellas?

Idealized in the sense that if the actor has one eye bigger than the other, HT won’t capture that and will make the eyes even, because it’s more “attractive” or “correct”. Idealized. Which also results an ‘inaccurate’ sculpt. Which means you’re not wrong. 😅😅

This is absolutely not fair. To say everyone that’s not on board with this sculpt and can’t find anything to praise are poisoning the hobby. So where does one draw the line? I’m genuinely asking. Not stirring ****, not here to make enemies. I do want to engage people here on a subject I adore...

@Mr. Awesome I get where you’re coming from. And given my own personal history of collecting HT since the beginning…I can tell you that they absolutely have the ability of capturing an actors likeness to a T…but they don’t for several reasons. Some you’re already familiar with just by being in...

…huh? Did you seriously feel I was being hostile with my reply? I was trying to be tongue in cheek by saying if you’re gonna have it hooded up, and have it displayed at the bottom of the shelf where there is less light, then just kitbash your mace. Like why spend $260-$280 on something you...

You’re not wrong. FOMO is the ultimate wallet killer. Then when you slap a “oh only 3000+ units available and a PO window of 3 hours…this is a MUST HAVE!!”, it’s easy to see how HT keeps getting away with this crap 😆.

Dude then just build your own in that case. I’m sure it’ll be much cheaper and a better alternative.

Not flexing, not saying you’re inferior. Just getting this outta the way in case my reply is misinterpreted in any way as inflammatory 😅 I’ve been collecting long enough that if a figure looks ****ty like this Mass Windy, I just won’t get it. I’ve owned SS Mace since it came out. But it’s been...

This is one of the worst ones. “Featuring Loke, with a stunning likeness to his appearance in Dark Crystal…” Finally dethroned by the Chinese knockoff “Make Windsor”. For real, wtf is this?? Nothing about this sculpt is ‘good enough’ or has a ‘passing likeness’. No amount of squinting...

I’m glad HT are expanding their SW catalogue. Not only are we getting figures from video games and expanded universe lore…now we’re getting the actors stunt doubles. Very cool. The guy on the right looks like a “bad Mutha****a” The guy on the left looks like…wait who is that mutha****a??!!

Mmm…I’m not convinced with the likeness. It seems off…I can’t quite put my finger on it. Eyes not round enough? Lips have too much of a Cupid’s bow?

I hate HT insistence on giving a portrait with an expression as the main and only sculpt. They NEED to stop doing that. Either give the figure to me with MULTIPLE portraits, or give me the one stoic, neutral expression. Snarling expressions like we see with Solo’s Maul works…but I’d still prefer...