https://whatculture.com/film/15-rea...-better-than-chris-nolans-the-dark-knight.php
Calling the usual suspects (DiFabio, intothevoid, etc.)
And.... GO!
(This is an older article, but I've never seen it discussed here specifically. I await the fun!)
The Batsuit is probably one of the most important things you need to get right when making a Batman movie. As well as concealing Bruce Wayne’s identity, the suit has to intimidate the criminal scum in Gotham and look really cool at the same time.
Michael Keaton’s suit in the 1989 film was designed by Bob Ringwood who based it on the Neal Adams design from the comics but instead of the established grey and blue, he made it all black. It set the mold for all future Batman movies and the design has never been topped. Everything about it is archetypal Batman, it’s sleek, not covered with distracting bits of armor, the cape is integrated into the suit and the black is broken up nicely by the yellow utility belt and emblem. Also the ears on the cowl are a good length and the cut off point where the jaw becomes visible is far enough back to give Batman a nice jawline. I know Michael Keaton had mobility problems while wearing the it and was unable to turn his head but on screen, his suit looked stunning and made an immediate impact.
Fast forward to Nolan’s Dark Knight trilogy and the obsession with realism ruined what should have been one of the iconic images to come out of the movies and that is Batman. The suit in Batman Begins was never going to be a classic, it looked rubbery, the cape was odd and the neck on the cowl was too fat. But they did give it a redesign for The Dark Knight but managed the impossible by actually making it look even worse. You can forgive the camouflaged logo, the annoying armor plating and the fact that the ears are too small but the biggest problem is the mouth area.
The cowl’s design was based on a motorcycle helmet and that was a very bad mistake. Christian Bale never had the best lips to carry off the Batman look and the design of the cowl made it look like his face was squished. It also robbed Batman of a decent jawline. Once you add on his ridiculous voice, the whole look becomes a joke.
It’s becoming a trait in Hollywood now that in order to look edgy and appeal to the kids, you need to make everything look super busy. Look at the design of the Transformers in the recent Michael Bay feature films where every Transformer had to be made up of a million parts. Nolan’s Batsuit has the same problem, with all the ridges and lines all over it, it looks too busy. Batman is smooth and elegant when he moves and the suit should reflect that. Even though the suit in Tim Burton’s film had the fake muscles, it didn’t go over board and cover every area with lines and shapes so that it looks ultra modern and like body armor. Less is more and Nolan’s suit had too much going on and just didn’t look cool. It’s a remarkable achievement when even George Clooney’s suit is more ascetically pleasing.
Don't forget "shut up you're going to jail"
Returns is my favorite Batman film, for all the reasons you mentioned. Plus I would add the moment on the dance floor when they discover each other's secret with just a line, was amazing!! And I love when Bruce is still trying to save her, because he cares even at the end. He just wants to go home
By the way, I absolutely 100% agree on #15 (THE BATSUIT):
I actually think the Returns suit might be my favorite. The 89 suit is cool but now looking at it again it's a little too "Schumachery" to me with the sculpted abs and pecs.
I agree, and think all this could also apply to the Superman franchises as I see them. Unfortunately, WB seems interested in more "realism and modernization" at the expense of trying to really capture the spirit of comics broadly defined.For the record, I've come around to being glad that we have these different "interpretations" of Batman (Burton and Nolan). They're both far from perfect, but I dig them on their own merits, overall.
That said, I'm always excited for a reboot because it gives me hope that a live action film will finally get the Batman formula right.
I agree, and think all this could also apply to the Superman franchises as I see them. Unfortunately, WB seems interested in more "realism and modernization" at the expense of trying to really capture the spirit of comics broadly defined.
Jesus, someone close this troll bait thread before it explodes.
Of course, the problem there is that this direction turns a nice profit. Little incentive to change when that's the case.
Maybe they'll decide a "nice" MoS profit is a far cry from the ridiculously overflowing profits of the Avengers.
That said when you look at the breakdown of the "list" of reasons Burton's Batman is better than Nolan's technically almost all of the same comparisons would favor the Schumacher films as well (simpler batsuits, more stylish batmobile/batwing/Gotham, the casts, lighthearted escape vs. real world blues, etc.) which utterly destroys any credibility the columnist was trying to achieve.
For the record, I've come around to being glad that we have these different "interpretations" of Batman (Burton and Nolan). They're both far from perfect, but I dig them on their own merits, overall.
That said, I'm always excited for a reboot because it gives me hope that a live action film will finally get the Batman formula right.
While I have my preferences and find myself drawn to rewatch one series over another, I do own both Burton's and Nolan's films. I even own Batman Forever (which believe it or not, I watch more often than either Burton flick).
The things I hear about JLA all the time makes me fear for the future of Batman on film. I would love something along the lines of Arkham City with no origin told all over again and I'd be satisfied. But for now, my "perfect formula" of Batman is B:TAS and MotP.
Enter your email address to join: