Hot Toys Avengers: Infinity War 1/6th Hulkbuster 2.0 Collectible Figure
- Thread starter guy66657
- Start date
Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:
Nah, people always talk about how much X figure is going to suck before the release, and then after the release everyone talks about how awesome it is. It’s the normal forum progression.
I’ll be happy to have both Hulkbusters in my collection. I’m trying to avoid spoilers for Endgame, but I’d get 3.0 too. [emoji12]
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
mikericm
Super Freak
What are your thoughts on 2.0? Especially compared to the look, in hand, of other armors?
- Joined
- Apr 25, 2015
- Messages
- 15,177
- Reaction score
- 4,144
Exactly I'd like to know your thoughts too. Especially compared to the original Hulkbuster.
Opened my 2.0, and I think it’s great. I also own the MMS Hulkbuster. For the money, I just don’t see how you could get the shelf presence that this adds for $400. It’s about as much bang for the buck that a Hot Toy collector can get. Gladiator Hulk might be a similarly good value.
I like that they made some paint changes from the prototype in the abs area too.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
I like that they made some paint changes from the prototype in the abs area too.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
- Joined
- Apr 25, 2015
- Messages
- 15,177
- Reaction score
- 4,144
So which ones better ?
I don’t know if I can answer that, both are great. The original Hulkbuster is somewhat a pain in the butt to pose, and has very limited articulation. The hidden bust/figure is cool I guess, but I’d have preferred more articulation.
Hulkbuster 2.0 is smaller in size, has very little articulation, but has a better/more dynamic pose than you can achieve with the original. So I’d say the original is better overall, but not for double the price.
Either one could be the centerpiece of your Hot Toy collection. I remember when I thought that about the “giant” Iron Monger. Iron Monger is tiny in comparison to either of these.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
dukefett
Super Freak
Was just reading on FB and I can't believe some people didn't know this wasn't a fully articulated figure. Like it's barely more expensive than a normal Iron Man suit. Some were even calling for die cast! It's amazing how little research some people do lol.
This guy is sitting at a UPS store waiting for me. Unfortunately I won’t be able to pick him up for at least another 10 days...
- Joined
- Apr 25, 2015
- Messages
- 15,177
- Reaction score
- 4,144
My main concern was the detail, or lack thereof in the smaller areas of the Power Pose. Do you see that smaller details are simply moulded in and painted over in not as much detail as the original Hulkbuster ?
Skillerwhale
Super Freak
This figure does not have the "hot toys" feel to it. The detail is noticeably lacking, parts are obviously made and then painted from a single cast.
Well yeah, that’s how they made it. That said, the paint application seems to be of normal Hot Toys quality to me. It’s a very impressive display piece.
Do you have one in-hand Skiller?
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Skillerwhale
Super Freak
I do. It's honestly the first buyers remorse I've felt in my time collecting HT. I'm also unsure of how to unload this thing to anyone as shipping it is going to suck.
I agree that the paint app is good BUT, as I stated the lack of undergated parts is painfully obvious. Glad for the people who are stoked on it, but it's just not for me.
Jim Morrison
Super Freak
Personally, I'd just be happy to claw back what I could and then put that towards a figure that will spark joy. Sometimes you just have to take the hit and move on.
gmoney5000
Super Freak
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2015
- Messages
- 4,857
- Reaction score
- 555
Well since it made like a 2 minute appearance in EG, maybe HT will consider giving it another go at a fully articulated figure instead of a power pose. One can only hope!
You can sell it and get most of your money back. I wasn’t thrilled with HPP Igor and sold mine off on this forum. I’ve sold off dozens of HT figures on here.
I guess it should also be noted, I’m one of the few guys here who likes the Power Pose series. I sold off my Diecast MK42, but kept the Power Pose for example. I like that the Power Pose figures are posed in a way that the regular figures cannot. After I’ve owned pretty much every Marvel HT that has ever been released, so I look for stuff that will look different in my display.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Skillerwhale
Super Freak
Fair enough, I do like the light up convenience you get with the PP figures. This guy also takes up ALLOT of shelf space, which is starting to become a rare commodity these days.
Raikirik
Super Freak
- Joined
- Sep 29, 2009
- Messages
- 1,955
- Reaction score
- 5
Took me a while to reply to this but I think it fits in very well with all the other armors released thus far.
I haven't owned a Powerpose before. The paint is not as bad as I was led to believe based on earlier reviews and neither are the details for what it is.
Next to HB 1.0 it looks smaller, but if not for that, this guy is indeed BIG. The things I definitely appreciate are the lights and the pose. Compared to my HB 1.0, I like the fact that the 2.0 achieves a more dynamic pose due to being PPS, which makes my 1.0 look like a stiff board lol.
Both figures have their pros and cons, but would I pay as much as I did for the 1.0 to have this thing be (articulated)? Probably not. For me, I don't utilize the articulation in the 1.0, so the price point and what you get for this figure is just right for me. I would actually take a HB 1.0 in PPS if it was offered.
I’d argue that the Hulkbuster 1.0 is basically a Power Pose figure since the articulation is so limited by the gimmick design choice. Honestly, who displays their Hulkbuster with a Diecast figure in it to actually take advantage of that?
It was a bad decision that not only delayed the figure by minimally a year, but doesn’t improve how the figure displays. It’s only really an advantage as a talking point.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Similar threads
