albundyland
Super Freak
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2012
- Messages
- 903
- Reaction score
- 56
Didn't he spend 15 minutes or something on the gap cap? lol All the stuff he's bringing up is legit, and everyone has tolerances of what quality means to them.Pretty unbiased but I could only shake my head when he started fixating on insignificant stuff like (a) how the canopy "could" fall into the cockpit & cause wear and (b) how the gear shifters rattle when moved and aren't as smooth as he'd like. Keep sliding the canopy back & forth and flicking the shifter with your finger, I'm sure that will help remedy things lol. Anyone with a lick of common sense will be taking great care when opening & closing the canopy (and it won't be happening with any great frequency), and this is going to be static in peoples' displays, so there won't be any rattling of gear shifters. I get trying to be thorough, but please.
Honestly, due to it's location the flat spot near the center of the turbine housing (top center on the hood of a normal car) would probably bother me more than anything else he pointed out (assuming it would be visible with my room lighting). I wonder if he reached out to @JazzInc about that?
p.s. - He should really look up the definition of congruent before thinking about using it so frequently again.
I'm of the opinion that if you need to shine a light a specific way to illicit the desired effect, it probably won't bother me too much. I actually think some of the surface irregularities make it look more realistic than a sterile, perfectly clean surface. I can't put my finger on exactly what it is, but the Jazz vehicle feels like a real car shrunk down to 1/6 scale, and the HT feels like a replica. Maybe it has to do with that?