I just have to be critical of anything that is supposedly incapable of conveying its quality or accuracy via photo or film.
For example- both 1/4 and 1/3 Blitzway Geralts look fantastic in every picture I see of them, thus I would have confidence to put money down for them- if I really wanted either.
If I have to simply have faith that a JND piece will somehow not look as sickly and hungover as photos indicate after I’ve paid for and can observe the physical object in person; I’m just not willing to make that gamble.
Absolutely agree.
However, I find that the vast majority of collector in hand photos are trash, mostly because photography is a skill that the vast majority of us don't have. We take photos in bad lighting, ignore the consideration of lens distortion and colour correction. Considering all that, for reasons I can't explain, silicone seems to photograph even more poorly than polystone or PVC......hence the reason why collectors commonly state that JND pieces look better "in person" then the photos portray.
So I get where you're coming from, and if you can't see one of these pieces in person - then you're pretty much taking some strangers word that JND is worth the money......perhaps an ill advised way to go