Wasn't aware of that situation but it illustrates what I was trying to say. As a long time collector of garage model kits I saw the way recasting tainted that hobby, and would rather not see it affect this one. As I stated before to me a recast is making a mold and casting someone elses work. PERIOD. Tweaking it, resizing it, repurposing whatever does not, in my mind, change the fact that it is a recast. If someone wants to tweak a sculpt for thier own collection, I have no problem with it. I wish I was talented enough to do it myself. When the customizer decides to mold it and sell it, to me, that is a recast. The original sculptor selldom gets credit or a portion of the profits. It's bad form. It puts a condition on an individual's stance against recasting. It opens up a grab bag of excuses recasters use to justify thier misdeeds. I did not want to be baited into a flame war, but I'm stuck at the airport gate with nothing to entertain myself so here goes. I will site 3 examples off the top of my head that illustrate what I see as a hypocritical view of recasting on this message board. If anyone cares to defend these actions be articulate because whatever argument you use to try and defend these projects proves my point.
1) Les Walker, a talented customizer and painter reworked some of the Hot Toys Aliens Colonial Marines. He did a nice job making the heads look more like the actors from the movie. Then he molded and cast up the modified sculpts. Endortsed by many members on this board and still discussed in a positive way long after he stopped selling them. Doesn't change the fact that they were essentially recast.
2) Next we have what I refer to as Bell's palsey Indiana Jones. A member here took the head from the Sideshow Raiders PF and made a mold of it. He then shrank it to 1/6th size and began selling castings of it. Again heavily endorsed and praised by many on this board. In another thread I talked about this being a recast. The guy who did it sent me a private message stating that Sideshow and Trevor Grove were ok with it, and besides he didn't make a lot of money from it. Guess what. It's still a recast.
3) Another member recently posted a mash up where he took two different SS heads of Han and Indy and made a Bespin Han. I admit I did not read the whole thread, but if I understood correctly he etched a few lines in the forehead. It took some work to pull it off, I'll give the guy that. Problem is it isn't all his work. Technically it's a recast. Yet it is being endorsed and embraced by many members here. Apparently he is sold out of the first run and plans to cast more.
Now if people are okay with this maybe the guy who is recasting Rainman's stuff should shave the eye brows off and resculpt them before making his molds? This seemed to be acceptable in the above projects. If he alterts the sculpt slightly it is okay right? Of course not. And the above shouldn't have been alright either. I can think of a few other examples but this should be enough to support my stance. All recast of any kind should be rejected. They only exist because people continue to buy them.