lerath666
Super Freak
The currious case of "muscle" bodies. Please read the first post before voting
here is a question that I've been pondering lately.
How many of my fellow freaks prefer aesthetic Over articulation on your 1/6th figures?
For example. the hot toys truetype body is one of the best articulated bodies in the 1/6th market. it poses very ver nicely, and has lit e to no problem holding that pose, and is fairly sturdy.
The other end of the spectrum is the hot toys rubber "muscle" body. there is No question that these bodies are the best LOOKING bodies on the marked if you intend to display a character shirtless. the muscle bodies do, however, have 2 very big drawbacks that you sacrafice for this added artistic blessing.
the first is durability. containted within the rubber arms, the figures elbows are composed of a flat metal strip that you bend to allow the figure to move his arms. as I'm sure many of may recall, this is not a new idea. wee all had toys as a child with metal skeletons, and eventualy, the metal would break from exces bending. eventualy, this will happen to the muscle bodies.
Also, the rubber CAN eventualy deteriate.
the second sacrifice we make is that of posability. Take, for example, dutch. as awesome as this figure is, hes has NO mid-torso, nor waist articulation. in addition, it's more or less impossible to put his rifle into realistic fireing pose. He CANNOT shoulder his rifle.
But that's the price we pay for asthetic.
Simply swapping dutch over to a regular truetype for example would fix it, but then his clothing would no longer fit.
ther seems to be this anti-exposed joint mentality, thinking that exposed joints makes a figure seem more toy-like.
I kinda shake my head at this concept, becuase, trying to be honest here they ARE toys. In specific, They're 1/6th action figures, more specificly, they're Dolls. so, my advice is to take off the rose-colored glasses and face reality. Much like the people who can't buy toys in a local toystore without pretending it's for their "cousin" or "nephew"'s birthday.
If you like something, you want it, and can afford it, buy it, but I digress.
Point is, is it worth it for you to trade off better articulation for asthetic?
here is a question that I've been pondering lately.
How many of my fellow freaks prefer aesthetic Over articulation on your 1/6th figures?
For example. the hot toys truetype body is one of the best articulated bodies in the 1/6th market. it poses very ver nicely, and has lit e to no problem holding that pose, and is fairly sturdy.
The other end of the spectrum is the hot toys rubber "muscle" body. there is No question that these bodies are the best LOOKING bodies on the marked if you intend to display a character shirtless. the muscle bodies do, however, have 2 very big drawbacks that you sacrafice for this added artistic blessing.
the first is durability. containted within the rubber arms, the figures elbows are composed of a flat metal strip that you bend to allow the figure to move his arms. as I'm sure many of may recall, this is not a new idea. wee all had toys as a child with metal skeletons, and eventualy, the metal would break from exces bending. eventualy, this will happen to the muscle bodies.
Also, the rubber CAN eventualy deteriate.
the second sacrifice we make is that of posability. Take, for example, dutch. as awesome as this figure is, hes has NO mid-torso, nor waist articulation. in addition, it's more or less impossible to put his rifle into realistic fireing pose. He CANNOT shoulder his rifle.
But that's the price we pay for asthetic.
Simply swapping dutch over to a regular truetype for example would fix it, but then his clothing would no longer fit.
ther seems to be this anti-exposed joint mentality, thinking that exposed joints makes a figure seem more toy-like.
I kinda shake my head at this concept, becuase, trying to be honest here they ARE toys. In specific, They're 1/6th action figures, more specificly, they're Dolls. so, my advice is to take off the rose-colored glasses and face reality. Much like the people who can't buy toys in a local toystore without pretending it's for their "cousin" or "nephew"'s birthday.
If you like something, you want it, and can afford it, buy it, but I digress.
Point is, is it worth it for you to trade off better articulation for asthetic?