i like them both but i don`t follow with the lotr pf line so Anakin was an easy choise for me.i kinda liked how hayden played anakin. also i think the new trilogy is closer to younger people like me.
Anakin easily. More imposing PF (and therefore eye-catching). I agree that Viggo is the greater actor (by such a wide margin that it makes the Grand Canyon a teeny ditch in the backyard) but the PF's aren't exactly going to be doing too much emoting now are they?... Or, are they?
Comes down to which you like best SW or LOTR. SW for me.
Anakin. He'll be the flagship PF of the PT. Awesome exclusive, light-up saber, and even if they mess up the paint it'll be easy to just send a head to a customizer for a quick fix.
Aragorn is from the better movies and is the better character. But the production piece isn't quite the homerun of the proto and is a little less impressive than Anakin in PF form. A lot of people have been getting Aragorns with hair broken off. And finally there's also that chance that we really *will* see an Aragorn PF with a "Return of the King" base which would allow for a possibly superior version down the line.
Khev, your statement is valid, up to a point. Aragorn is now in-hand. We don't know yet what Anakin will look like when in-hand.
For me, how anyone can justify a whiner like Anakin to grace their collection, is beyond me, unless you like his pretty boy face. How a SW fan can justify getting Anakin first is baffling, unless they have the Vader PF as well.
HC may be the worst actor to take home a paycheck. Viggo is an excellent actor but too "sensitive" for my taste. Buy the Hellboy. Ron Pelrman is a blue collar God.