Mondragon
Super Freak
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2014
- Messages
- 3,177
- Reaction score
- 4,389
So twins, where'd the other one end up (other side of the station)?I'd be fine if Alvarez simply gives us one more film, ....
Last edited:
So twins, where'd the other one end up (other side of the station)?I'd be fine if Alvarez simply gives us one more film, ....
Ridley was wise to take the Prometheus route and leave the carbon copying to lesser writers/directors.
Can someone explain the logic of the first 20 minutes to me:
She's served her time and all she wants to do is get off world... 5 minutes later they all grab a ship and go off world - couldn't they have just done that at any point and ****** off to wherever they wanted to? Do they have proximity detonators in their heads or something? I'm completely baffled.
And I'm hoping there's a reason why an android is acting like he has a mental disability? Has he been programmed that way to be more sympathetic - or is he just written that way for audience sympathy?
Turned it off, and hoping for some clarity before bothering to continue.
A lot of truth in this post. IMO Ridley really tainted the lore with his nonsense take on Creationism which had no business ever appearing on screen in this series. One of the main reasons I don't take Prometheus and Covenant as canon.I disagree.
Ridley Scott and Tony Scott have always wanted to do a series of films centered around The Book Of Enoch. Except many would feel that kind of storyline would carry too much of an anti-Christian sentiment. The Scott brothers were told to leave it alone. They persisted. Then Tony Scott "committed suicide". If you do a high level complex prestige version of the Book Of Enoch story, you won't find someone to distribute it. Now that the current industry is splitting into major separate camps over Israel/Palestine, I don't see how it has any future pathway period.
Ridley Scott should have written Prometheus himself. It's his story, his lore, his universe, he should have written it so it was a story done his way. Instead his abuse of Jon Spaihts created a lot of private backlash towards him. Talented people don't want to deal with that kind of chaos and drama, even if it's to work with a legendary director. He didn't just burn out one good writer, he created a situation where other skilled writers would just avoid him. And if Scott wants to make a film that says God doesn't exist and those that still believe are foolish and sheepish, he should just have made that film and not tried to mix it into the Alien lore.
Scott fumbled the bag. This is all on him. He's lost the Alien franchise, it's been effectively taken out of his hands, he's only around in name only, because he kept losing money trying to fulfill his vision. What happened on Prometheus was unforgivable down the line. It wasn't just Scott's career at stake with that film. Many other people worked on that film and had to carry that anchor around their neck, against their career potential, to eat Scott's failures.
Will I say it? OK, I will. Ridley Scott has to come to terms that the films he really wants to make will alienate a large share of the American movie going audience. You can't just keep prodding poor white rural Christian America. Even if you don't agree with them. Even if you look down on them.
I watched it recently also. Not a fan....All in all, this reads like a fan film covering no new ground. If you want a fix, watch Alien & Aliens,...forget the rest.
Watch that be the one with proper IMAX formatting, lol.
If playing it safe grants more sequels,
what do you think those sequels will be?
More playing it safe, more of the same,
this franchise is a yawn fest after 2.
Unless I'm not understanding you, I think you have to pay more attention...Can someone explain the logic of the first 20 minutes to me:
She's served her time and all she wants to do is get off world... 5 minutes later they all grab a ship and go off world - couldn't they have just done that at any point and ****** off to wherever they wanted to? Do they have proximity detonators in their heads or something? I'm completely baffled.
And I'm hoping there's a reason why an android is acting like he has a mental disability? Has he been programmed that way to be more sympathetic - or is he just written that way for audience sympathy?
Turned it off, and hoping for some clarity before bothering to continue.
Uhm... so, do you work in the industry? Or where do you get all this insider info from?I disagree.
Ridley Scott and Tony Scott have always wanted to do a series of films centered around The Book Of Enoch. Except many would feel that kind of storyline would carry too much of an anti-Christian sentiment. The Scott brothers were told to leave it alone. They persisted. Then Tony Scott "committed suicide". If you do a high level complex prestige version of the Book Of Enoch story, you won't find someone to distribute it. Now that the current industry is splitting into major separate camps over Israel/Palestine, I don't see how it has any future pathway period.
Ridley Scott should have written Prometheus himself. It's his story, his lore, his universe, he should have written it so it was a story done his way. Instead his abuse of Jon Spaihts created a lot of private backlash towards him. Talented people don't want to deal with that kind of chaos and drama, even if it's to work with a legendary director. He didn't just burn out one good writer, he created a situation where other skilled writers would just avoid him. And if Scott wants to make a film that says God doesn't exist and those that still believe are foolish and sheepish, he should just have made that film and not tried to mix it into the Alien lore.
Scott fumbled the bag. This is all on him. He's lost the Alien franchise, it's been effectively taken out of his hands, he's only around in name only, because he kept losing money trying to fulfill his vision. What happened on Prometheus was unforgivable down the line. It wasn't just Scott's career at stake with that film. Many other people worked on that film and had to carry that anchor around their neck, against their career potential, to eat Scott's failures.
Will I say it? OK, I will. Ridley Scott has to come to terms that the films he really wants to make will alienate a large share of the American movie going audience. You can't just keep prodding poor white rural Christian America. Even if you don't agree with them. Even if you look down on them.
I don't think you're supposed to like him.Watched it again in 4K. Fantastic film, but I HATE that ****** Bjorn.
I don't think you're supposed to like him.
I didn’t even know this film was releasing,Lots of Alien Isolation fans out there. Probably some Alien Isolation fans in this thread even. I'm happy for them. If I see something that doesn't vibe for me, but others really enjoy it, I'm happy for them at least. Then I can recalibrate and decide to stop following a series. If you want out at this point, you want out, no one is stopping you dude.
Alvarez made Romulus for 80 million. Which in today's climate, is extremely lean for a sci fi/horror film coming from a legacy IP. Give him more budget, he'll make you a bigger more expansive movie.
But you've already decided you are out. Good luck to you with other franchises. Last thing, if you watch the next Alien film down the pipe in the near future, after you've said you are tired of the same old/same old, what does that say about your convictions? Do what you want dude.
Enter your email address to join: