We both shared our opposing view points but nothing dramatic about.
You said you felt the InArt was hyper real. I don't think it is, but there was no animosity or anger behind it. Just disagreeing. Nothing more needed to be added
You brought comparison between the InArt and HT figure
as a whole into the conversation when I didn't. I was simply talking about the capes which is why I left that part out of my second reply as it had nothing to do with the capes
Not sure how you got that from me saying that I felt the InArt cape was inaccurate and needed replacing no different than you saying the HT capes were crap. I literally said that I'd agree with you and your assessment about the capes had the they been accurate. B/c yea, it is stupid to be spending $50+ on a cape. Unfortunately, even though InArt gave 2 presumably really well made capes, they're still inaccurate. Please tell me how me calling the InArt capes inaccurate make it seem like I'm saying the InArt figure is a total fail?
This bit below implies that my thinking is that HT was better or that I'm dismissing the issues that HT has when I never even brought up the HT proportions in the first place, which garnered the "please tell me where I said..." response. Again, only commented on the capes.