wormlander
Super Freak
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2010
- Messages
- 701
- Reaction score
- 679
Yup, And also bloody rhinos...I have always wanted to see a modern version of the boat fights, I was so happy when I saw that in the trailer.
Yup, And also bloody rhinos...I have always wanted to see a modern version of the boat fights, I was so happy when I saw that in the trailer.
OMG I forgot yes.Yup, And also bloody rhinos...
Scott: Should we research if people really rode Rhinos into battle?
Historical Consultant: Found it!
Scott: That's good enough for me!
Classically trained poets and writers at the time would have been exposed to a few sources that painted ancient Romans as just the sort of people who would vomit just to eat more. One source was Seneca, the Stoic who lived from 4 B.C. to A.D. 65 and who gave the impression that Romans were an emetic bunch. In one passage, he wrote of slaves cleaning up the vomit of drunks at banquets, and in his Letter to Helvia, he summarized the vomitorium idea succinctly but metaphorically, referring to what he saw as the excesses of Rome: "They vomit so they may eat, and eat so that they may vomit."
Inevitably someone is going to CG Grogu into every scene with Pascal.[ATTACH=full]712773[/ATTACH]
Just from what little I’ve read so far, like Kingdom of Heaven there are huge departures from real world history. This is basically the story of Maximus’ son Lucius Verus. Sort of an MCU “What If”-like treatment, i.e., alternative history fantasy.
Well at least according to some:‘Gladiator II’ First Reactions Call Ridley Scott’s Sequel “Unhinged,” “Deliciously Cinematic And Machiavellian”: “Can’t Believe Ridley Pulled This Off”
https://deadline.com/2024/10/gladia...iciously-cinematic-machiavellian-1236121555/#
...just about everyone who’s seen Gladiator II is taking to social media in praise of Ridley Scott‘s highly-anticipated sequel.
I'm guessing reviewers will be meaninglessly throwing around the word "Epic" to describe the spectacle, yet not surprised, if the emotional punch, what sold the original (at least for me) what made it worth while, will be lacking.It’s largely uneven & lacks the emotional punch of the first film,”
Yeah. Suspect I will put it in the Romulus category. Enjoyable, many well done aspects, probably too much rehash, but on the better side of sequels and definitely worth a movie ticket.It's a Ridley Scott historical(ish) epic. Will be watching on that basis alone, but I don't expect it to compete with the original or Kingdom of Heaven.
I don’t think so.
This is a _direct_ sequel, not a reboot or alt history reimagining.
It is the story of Lucius, who is Commodus’ nephew, not Maximus’ son. Connie Nielson reprises her role from the original film as Commodus’ sister and Lucius’ mother.
I think.
Haven’t seen it yet but am making plans!
Z
In Gladiator II, the character of Lucius Verus is highly fictionalized compared to the life of the historical Lucius Verus II. In the movie, Lucius is depicted as reaching adulthood, undergoing personal trials, and eventually training as a gladiator to seek revenge, a storyline that diverges drastically from the real Lucius’s life. Historically, Lucius Verus II, the son of Lucilla (and likely the grandson of Marcus Aurelius), died young, likely before he could reach adulthood, and definitely before Commodus’s rule. Thus, he would never have had the opportunity for the gladiatorial heroics or political vengeance portrayed in the film .
In addition, Gladiator II adds a fictionalized layer in which Lucius, influenced by Maximus’s legacy, takes up a personal vendetta against Rome. He’s shown enduring enslavement, fighting as a gladiator, and challenging Roman rulers—none of which align with any documented actions by the historical Lucius Verus II. His mother, Lucilla, also plays a much larger role in the film than historically plausible, as she was executed by Commodus after a failed coup, thus severing her involvement in Lucius’s life long before he could have pursued any vengeful mission .
This reimagining allows Gladiator II to focus on an emotionally complex storyline with themes of legacy, vengeance, and power dynamics within the Roman Empire, but it does so with considerable creative liberties taken from the actual events and lives of Lucius and his family.
In Gladiator II, the character of Lucilla is significantly fictionalized compared to historical records. In real life, Lucilla was indeed the daughter of Emperor Marcus Aurelius and sister to Commodus, and she played a prominent role in Roman society as Augusta (Empress) after marrying Lucius Verus. However, her depiction in the films as romantically entangled with Maximus and as a central conspirator against Commodus is largely a creation of the storyline. Historically, Lucilla did conspire against Commodus out of concern for her family’s safety and her desire to protect Rome from her brother’s increasingly erratic rule. Yet, her plot was discovered, and she was eventually executed for her role in this failed conspiracy.
The films also portray Lucilla as having an ongoing connection to political and military affairs long after Commodus’s reign, especially through her son, Lucius. In reality, after her marriage, Lucilla’s influence waned considerably, and her life ended in her early 30s following her execution. By extending her story, the films deepen the dramatic tension but do so with substantial deviation from history.
In Gladiator II, Denzel Washington’s character, Macrinus, is only loosely based on the historical Macrinus. The film reimagines him as a wealthy arms dealer and influential power player who manages gladiators and supplies resources to Rome’s military. This fictional Macrinus wields significant political sway, forming a relationship with Lucius Verus to exploit his potential for vengeance. Historically, however, Macrinus was a praetorian prefect who conspired to assassinate Emperor Caracalla, ultimately seizing power as emperor—a complex political figure, rather than the gladiator-affiliated tycoon portrayed in the movie.
Yeah, for better or worse, leaves no doubt, Maximus was the father, she outright confirms it.https://deadline.com/2024/04/gladiator-2-first-look-paramount-cinemacon-1235882043/
I honestly can't make sense of that sentence? Though seems to confirm it in the next.
"Says Paul Mescal’s son of Russell Crowe’s late Maximus in a VoiceOver, ..."
Lucius Verus was Maximus' son.
Seemed obvious, yet is that the first outright confirmation of it?
Nah, Lucilla was Commodus' sister not wife. They are both the children Marcus Aurelius.Lucilla who was Commodus’ wife,
Nah, Lucilla was Commodus' sister not wife. They are both the children Marcus Aurelius.
Yes things got creepy (and did back then), Commodus exerts insane power and threats over his sister (and her son), but they are not depicted as being married (and were not in real life).
Enter your email address to join: