Search results

They absolutely do care about money. And only money. Star wars -Disney bought the property. Tried to distill down star wars to its essence. Even George Lucas couldn't recapture the magic of his own trilogy in the prequels. They end up being wildly financially and critically successful with...

Everything about this rant is so factually wrong I dont even know where to begin. You live in a fantasy land. "They care about financial returns until a film gathers a cult-like following of people they despise." - Wrong. They care about financial returns at all times. "They made their...

The first movie from the very beginning was always praised for its below the line qualities- cinematography, score, etc, and also Phoenix' acting. The majority of the bad reviews said this as well. The reviewers who gave it bad scores just added on that they thought it was derivative...

Use your brain. They made a sequel to the joker as a slow courtoom drama, with musical numbers, it purposefully didnt give the audience the payoffs it wanted, and made him die a failure. There is nothing not risky about any of that. You can hate. Everyone hates it. But to say it wasnt risky...

Why would I like it? I didnt like folie a deux.

Having no character growth has nothing to do with risk or not, which is what I was talking about. You can say its bad to not have certain character growth. But if the bones of folie a deux remained roughly the same- he started off as meek arthur in the jail, became joker again, broke out, and...

Just to make sure I understand what you are saying...you are claiming that he purposefully tried to make a bad movie that even he thought sucked to give a middle finger to everyone?

Of course there is good and bad risk, thats what risk is. Taking risks leads to good and bad movies, typically more bad than good ones. No one said audiences don't reward risk.

In the context of what I was talking about- ghostbusters 2 is not a good reference. Ghostbusters 2 set out to be a safe satisfying sequel, similar in tone and general vibe as the first. A supernatural force will threaten to destroy the city and the ghostbusters will save the day. It was the...

Regardless if anyone likes or dislikes the movie- we need more movies like this that take bizarre chances, now more than ever. The majority of movies today are made by committee and are focus grouped to the max to shave off any interesting edges because studios are worried about a single nickel...

Is it still confirmed this will release in 1/6 or did everyone misunderstand what they meant when they said they are going to release a dark knight- maybe they just meant in 1/12?

If this isn't the best Cavill figure ever, what is? You are factually wrong if you are claiming most figures improve from prototype to production. There is always a drop off in paint and sculpt softness.

The production headsculpt was softened a tiny amount, the same as any other sculpt- and your opinion went from -best cavill headsculpt ever, to -not seeing cavill in it? At a normal viewing distance the differences arent even noticeable- because it is the same headsculpt. This is the figure...

Learn a lesson? Debacle?

this looks awful

headsculpt looking better than hot toys already

The production sculpt looks better the proto.

Is the headsculpt improved from the proto?

Its baffling how good inart figures look. These look like movie promos shots

Right. It would make sense that someone who can’t obtain the exclusive thing would be upset that it is exclusive, and the people who can obtain the exclusive thing feel extra happy because they got something that others could not get- due to its exclusivity. That is its purpose.