- Joined
- May 23, 2011
- Messages
- 6,574
- Reaction score
- 9,594
Tell me about it. There is an undercurrent of authoritarianism to the Jedi, you get the sense that they would go too far in order to hang on to their status in the Republic, but this is left vague and unclear in the actual movies.
And don’t get me started on Count Dooku being a “political idealist, not a murderer.” Ok, what are his ideals? What are his grievances against the Republic? What is the entire public motivation for the Separatist movement that starts the war in the first place?
I love these movies, but the storytelling is…..clunky. GL is a filmmaking and worldbuilding genius, but as a dramatist, he needs help.
CANNOT WAIT TO GET SOME SHINY CLONE FIGURES, THOUGH.
Again, not a huge fan of the Jedi myself but while they can be far too aloof and out of touch with people outside the order, their main goal was to try to maintain the status quo with some semblance of peace and balance within the galaxy.
I don’t think of them as authoritarian, but they could be. And the Clone War should’ve pushed some of them to think that way over time like it did for Anakin. That should’ve been the coup against Palpatine in ROTS that gave him just cause to eliminate them.
I do agree about Lucas. Not being great at writing political intrigue and character dialogue definitely hampered the PT significantly. There’s a lot more that could’ve been said and done about the Jedi, Palpatine, the Clones, and the war. But there’s content outside of the films that have added a lot to the conflict.
Dooku was given more motivation in the past, and Tales of the Jedi has given him proper backstory and context for his actions in the new canon. I highly recommend watching the episodes around him. They add a lot to the character.