Appreciate the enthusiasm and glad to be talking about something relevant than other things.
For me personally, I think that’s a bit too much power fantasy and forced conflict placed onto two characters who both don’t really have established motivations (as of yet) to clash with each other. But that’s just my opinion. Your opinions are your own and valid for you.
Again, it is my observation that she does not seem to actively seek out conflict. Only to defend herself. She skillfully resolved the tension between Din Djarin and Paz Vizsla diplomatically. She told Din Djarin that Grogu is not an enemy despite his kind, the Jedi, being the ancient enemy of Mandalore.
Being wise and level enough to make that sort of distinction means she is not a rabid fanatic. I certainly do not see her as some kind of justiciar looking to punish or execute people without extremely good cause.
Her main concern always seems to be the foundlings, and the well being of the foundlings is important to Din Djarin as well. So long as those goals align, I don’t see conflict.
She would probably be more upset if he had hypothetically abandoned his quest, word, and creed to help Grogu than for taking his helmet off, regardless of what consequences of that there may or may not be.
Future seasons will hold higher stakes, intrigue, politics, sure. But I’m not convinced Din Djarin and The Armorer are going to have an armed conflict specifically. That is not how I read their characters.
I’m certainly not ruling out he could end up in power in some capacity, even if he doesn’t want it. That’s a potential path they could take his story. And there’s always the possibility of some sort of conflict between them, though there would have to be more development towards that.
If anything, I would imagine he would want his old tribe to join him on Mandalore through diplomacy than fighting. And if a new Mandalore is seated, many will follow them willingly.
We will agree to disagree and look forward to the next season to see what happens.
View attachment 530348
