ActionJackson83
Super Freak
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2010
- Messages
- 1,540
- Reaction score
- 18
Oh yeah, most definitely
This kicked *** in the box office...around 130 million $ us and world wide
Awesome movie! Not as good as the original '300' but a great companion piece.
For those confused, the movie is a prequel AND sequel. Mostly because a lot of the action is going on concurrently while Leonidas and the 300 Spartans march on Thermopylae. Think of it like a TV show, they'd show clips of the 300 and then flash over to scenes with what Themistocles (and Persia) are doing. They mention a lot about the action going on with the 300, so you aren't entirely lost (like messengers coming to Themistocles and telling him that Leonidas had fallen).
Stapleton did a good job. Butler's Leonidas is a much more interesting character but Stapleton's Themistocles is a much calmer, more "strategic" fighter. He displays his experience in command with the fleet war he has with Artemisia. He is from Athens, and thus, as much a politician and strategist as he is a warrior..which was common for Ancient Greek leaders (see also Pericles). As told by some of his dialogue, he expected Leonidas to fall which would give him the lynchpin to bring the Greek city-states together.
Eva Green's Artemisia is ridiculously hot and deliciously evil. By far she is the best character out of the movie and the most interesting. She's utterly ruthless and manipulative. It's too bad they didn't dwell more on her origin but they did have to get to all the battles. Eva Green does a great job of balancing the character as both a military commander and a sociopath.
Extended cameos by some familiar faces from 300 too. I hope they go the route of finishing up the Greco-Persian wars with the Battle of Plataea which was the final land battle of the wars. Once again, you can introduce a new main character (Pausanias, Greek Commander-in-Chief, a Spartan general who served as regent after Leonidas' death), a new villain (Mardonius) and have hold-overs from the previous movies.
No Cyclops or Minotaurs or Medusa, or any of the Greek Mythology creatures are in it? Man that stinks.........JK
Saw it yesterday and loved it. The fight scenes were done so well. Loved the ending--though it seemed to conflict with the ending of the first film as far as I remember.
Made me appreciate Xerxes more though and that's more than I ever would have expected going into it...
I saw this on Sunday and I enjoyed it! Compared to the first film, it's not as strong, but the battles were better then the first movie imo. I do wish they had more of the bats__t crazy stuff like goat people and giant guys with severed arm blades the first movie had, there was some stuff like that but not as striking as the first movie. I also wish the ending on ROAE was stronger. But I liked this enough that I want to see ROAE again. Eva Green was the standout of the film.
The ending of the first movie jumped forward to the Battle of Plataea that ended the war as mentioned here by Bardoon. I don't see anything conflicting with the first movie.
The real Xerxes is still a prick, his father Darius was not wounded by Themistocles, he simply died of old age while planning the second invasion of Greece. Xerxes really just wanted to conquer Greece to prove himself.
I hope there's another sequel. I'd like the third movie to finish the Battle of Salamis and then finish the film and the series with Plataea.
Enter your email address to join: