Michael Crawford
Super Freak
- Joined
- Sep 11, 2005
- Messages
- 5,233
- Reaction score
- 45
Sorry, but I like Brant - and his reviews.
I bought mine pre-broke but got a good deal on it. It's super easy to fix though.One of Nine said:He was spot on about the smart gun handle. Mine broke after about 2 mins trying to pose his arms while attached to the gun, but like him a spot of SG helped me out.
I think she had her sleeves pushed up on her arms, low tack double sided tape might work well. If you ever have to roll a 1:6 figure's sleeves up their arms, always take the jacket or shirt off the figure and pre-roll the sleeves up and then slip the jacket on (it also helps to not have the hands to deal with when sliding the jacket back on so remove them too).pjam said:I'm gonna build my Rip this week. Any suggestions on how to keep her flight jacket sleeves rolled up on her arms? I may just use double sided tape inside the jacket sleeves...
Still looking for HT female hands, may have to find some substitute, maybe SSC female hands and drill them out or something like Howie does...
I couldn't agree with you more pjam. Did Michael just pull some nerd off the street to review these? He obviously has no clue that Hudson utilizes the Viet Nam Stoner headsculpt or that it doubles for a perfect Michael Biehn likeness to swap for Hicks (thanks again Hot Toys) and goes on to ridicule Hot Toys for being poor sculptors. If he only had the first clue about the likeness issues (see my last post) or knew the first thing about customizing and how these "model kits" can be made to look IDENTICAL to their movie counterparts he wouldn't have a leg to stand on. His last review of the T-1000 was completely off base it wasn't funny. I don't understand why Michael didn't review these himself. Maybe the guy has his hands full but why not recruit someone who actually KNOWS what they are talking about not some ignorant putz who obviously thinks he's being clever with his writing. I prefer an unbiased and objective review that can argue the pros and the cons with equal validity.pjam said:Isn't this same guy who's last review (T 1000) was slammed all over this board, comments posted were like 3 to 1 negative? Yep checked, same guy. If that isn't a hint, I don't know what is. Anyone who doesn't even know Ripley's body wasn't sculpted for her doesn't deserve to have a review posted on this thread IMO.
Well, I guess it is appropriate for April Fools...
Thanks Paul.pjam said:Moving on... more pics guys!
And good luck Chase!
Good luck finding them!King Darkness said:
Mudshark said:That "review" simply HAD to be an April Fool's gag...