grphyx1
Super Freak
if they want to find out who killed her in an hour they should call the people over at the jeffersonian institute with Booth and Bones
Yeah I saw that comparison a lot but other than the show revolving around the mystery of a murdered girl, the two shows really have nothing else in common like you said.
The only problem with a show like this is:
1. With a single case to focus on it makes every episode critical. So if people miss one show, they might get lost and then lose interest.
2. I know AMC is good about supporting their shows but it would suck if the ratings tanked and the show got canceled. Which is usually the biggest risk when investing time as a viewer in a show like this (never finding out what happened).
3. It's a one trick pony. If the first season is successful, will they do a second with a single case again!? I just don't see this working twice for one show. I hope so though, because I like this show.
I hate to break it to you, but the show IS filmed in Vancouver.
I think AMC said during on of the write-ups that it was going to run the season no matter what the ratings are
24 ran for what 7 seasons as a 1 trick pony, I don't see why a short series like this can't work if it's well done like it seems to be so far.
I liked it. I'm not a big fan of crime dramas because they get wrapped up so fast. I like the slow pace and getting to know the characters. I'd rather see things unfold. And I'm fine with it being one season.
As far as who did it, from what I've read they've done a good job keeping you guessing (if they're sticking to the original series). That being said, it was Killer Bob.
Btw, what the hell was that thing washed up on the beach in the very beginning of the show?
Looked like a dog or pig to me.
Btw, what the hell was that thing washed up on the beach in the very beginning of the show?
The premiere was AMC's second-highest original series premiere following The Walking Dead. The premiere drew 2.7 million viewers and a 2 household rating. The two encores of the premiere episode brought the ratings of the premiere up to a total of 4.6 million total viewers and a 3.7 household rating.
So is Linden's son not really Linden's son? Did anyone else get that as well from that scene where she meets her replacement/partner and he's asking about the dead chick in the photo and asks about what happened to her child and Linden doesn't respond?
I had a different take on that scene. For me, it set up Sarah Linden's character and personality when it comes to her job.
She didn't freak out and showed absolutely no emotion while approaching that thing that washed up. And it was intentionally shot to look like a possible body. And again, Linden didn't freak out or panic. She took a closer look, made an assessment of what it was i.e. not human, and then looked off in the distance.
And that's essentially how she approaches her job throughout both episodes. Her partner was quick to jump to conclusions, while Linden remained reserved and calculated.
And that's a complete contrast to how she is with her son and her boyfriend. Almost like two different people.
Enter your email address to join: