wookster
Very foolish words man!
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2007
- Messages
- 5,824
- Reaction score
- 12
I'm no lawyer, but I know that the vast bulk of international law concerns international trade. And foreign countries have an interest in following and enforcing that kind of law because it can hurt their standing with other countries vis-a-vis their ability to maintain minimal barriers to trade if they fail to do so (the WTO can make a U.S. President shake in his boots while he can ignore and dismiss international courts concerned with more explicitly political/security issues). But even domestically, I would imagine that China will have more anti-bootlegging/unlicensed product movement as more legit companies are built up and establish influence there.
The major threat to DiD in this instance, though, may be their ability to sell these in the U.S. U.S. laws frown on all this of course, and Apple can well threaten distributors and retailers trying to sell these here, which is presumably the primary customer base for this figure. They could also make life more difficult for DiD in general as time goes on by forcing them to defend themselves in court.
My understanding is in icons/DID says they are not selling any Apple related accessories (iPhone, iPad or Mac) with the Jobs figure or anything with Apple brand identity (i.e., logos). Thus, ensuring themselves one less wrangle from Apple's legal wrath.
Maybe Apple should threaten to not build all of their products in China then...
Enter your email address to join: