spindrift
Super Freak
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2009
- Messages
- 13,326
- Reaction score
- 121
Yep, it's too bad they felt pressure from BvS to make Civil War instead of a proper solo Cap 3.
How true- no doubt it would have been a very different Cap 3...
Yep, it's too bad they felt pressure from BvS to make Civil War instead of a proper solo Cap 3.
So are we saying we are not allowed to compare two films released the same year about comic hero's who are pitted against each other??
You mean like one that wasn't the excellent final product that we got?How true- no doubt it would have been a very different Cap 3...
My only real take away from this movie was, how hot is Emily van camp?...
I thought she was wasted and only reason she was in it was to give Cap a love interest
Do whatever you want, but that **** got tired well before Civil War was even released.
These threads are often a total embarrassment.
Well I for one have not compared BvS to Civil War before the film got released other than to say that WB and Snyder where doing it too fast. I liked BvS with my first viewing. Liked it less with my second. Then I saw CW and I could not help but compare. I am not friends with either filmmaker so I find no issues comparing the two and stating which one IMO pulled it off better.
O come on man you know how these forums get over the summer when movies come out. It's a war from May til August .
Do whatever you want, but that **** got tired well before Civil War was even released.
These threads are often a total embarrassment.
You mean like one that wasn't the excellent final product that we got?
Yeah, I'm good.
Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk
I'm in the same boat, as cbm fans, we will compare them, at least I did in terms of overall enjoyment. For in b vs s there were to many wtf moments an in civil war, there was nothing new. So I'm hoping SS has something different I will enjoy
Oh I know. It just gets boring reading the same old tired worn out tripe over and over again by the same usual suspects.
Agreed.
Yep, it's too bad they felt pressure from BvS to make Civil War instead of a proper solo Cap 3.
I know right....
Some people just wanted it to take place at night in the rain with broody characters lots of over the top violence and plosions with Pa Stark piling rocks talking to Tony. i am glad we get two perspectives (tho I haven't caught on to Snyder's yet) otherwise, how boring would these be if both companies used the same approach.
Comparrison between these two movies are inevitable. There's always someone who has to start stuff up. I always said you can't compare the two. That would be unfair. Civil War had 8 years of development to draw from, and Batman v Superman is a totally new interpretation of all three characters.
I may be misunderstanding you but this, to me, reads like ''BvS rushed it's universe-building and crammed everything into one film with no build-up'' and because of that it should be...excused from comparison to Civil War? That feels like moving the goal-posts to me so no one comes down hard on BvS.
The year has had 2 superhero movies that pit good guys against good guys - the comparison is inevitable, preferences are inevitable. Marvel and DC both chose their respective paths to this kind of scenario. IMO one of those paths is quite simply the better one and from what I'm hearing has resulted in a far more satisfying film.
Yeah naturally folks will gravitate towards one style vs the other neither right nor wrong. It really boils down to what you want in a film. While I like good action and a story if I relate to the character and their purpose the other two can be lacking or absent and I'll find something to enjoy. I love how Evans & co. portray Cap on screen as I can relate to 90% of his actions, thoughts etc. making it easy to fall into his adventures.
Cavill / Supes on the other hand, I cannot find a single thing yet to connect me to his character. Thankfully Batman was bad ass or it'd been another crap feast for me.
Yeah, I don't see the letter as a cop out at all. This was Cap's doing, not Tony's. And Cap wasn't even mad at Tony at the end. Just doing what he had to to protect his best friend. He's not the kind of guy who would let something like that get in the way of his doing the right thing to serve mankind. Tony told Cap to give up the shield, and seemed to really write off their friendship, and Cap obliged. But that's about as far as it went.Not necessarily. It wasn't Tony who wrote the letter seeking peace and it was Tony who was angry, not Capt. It's in character for Capt to apologize ...especially with a letter since he's a soldier from a different era. I'm glad it wasn't an email Still, that letter does't change much.
I do think Tony should have burnt the letter after reading it, but that might have been too similar to Alfred burning the letter at the end of TDK.
Maybe throwing the letter in the trashcan might have worked too, and that way they can always bring back the letter in the next film.
Agreed. I was hoping she would develop into more of a player here, but just more of the same we saw in Winter Soldier. Another forgettable supporting female character like Maria Hill.I thought she was wasted and only reason she was in it was to give Cap a love interest
I'm indifferent to the styles, think they can both work for each universe and deliver a good final product, personally BvS failed at that as the execution was terrible, leaving a bad cinematic experience, like I said to many wtf moments
Enter your email address to join: