King Darkness
Super Freak
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2006
- Messages
- 44,456
- Reaction score
- 209
GOD
WTF is with all these damn remakes!
WTF is with all these damn remakes!
There is NO WAY you could remake Robocop and make it better! Halloween? Sure why not (Although not even close to Carpenters version) Friday the 13th? Sure why not but Robocop? What the hell is wrong with these people? I can promise you they executives that sprung the idea have NOT seen part 3.
Hollywood is just ridiculous!
There is NO WAY you could remake Robocop and make it better! Halloween? Sure why not (Although not even close to Carpenters version) Friday the 13th? Sure why not but Robocop? What the hell is wrong with these people? I can promise you they executives that sprung the idea have NOT seen part 3.
Hollywood is just ridiculous!
This is legit, although it could be a TV series or some other media besides a feature remake/sequel.
I'm betting none of you saw the Canadian series of Robocop TV movies, eh?
And I'm sure that's not Weller under the mask - they probably haven't cast it yet.
I could definitely see a continuation of the franchise. What happens if they keep making Robocops? So there's a whole platoon out there and someone finds a way to control them remotely and takes over the force. Get Peter Weller back and McMurphy, now in his cloned human body, must put on the some suped up cop armor and take them all on single-handedly.
I'd buy that for a dollar!
has H-wood really run out of original ideas so they need to remake a movie that has absolutely no need? the original was already kickass. sheesh.
whoa, how is that insulting tippett?
he hasn't done any stop-motion work since coneheads, i think.
he does cgi just like everybody else, now. so, he'd probably be the one messing with a remake anyway.
i'd call that starship troopers sequel he did more of an insult to his work than anything.
but there are kids of 16 who have never seen a Robocop movie
...in the cinema. Surely most 16 year olds have seen the films though.
Something I find stupid about making a watered down sequel to an R rated film in order to attract younger audiences is the fact that having seen the watered down, kiddified sequel they are encouraged to go back and watch the original, which the higher age rating is supposed to forbid them from seeing. If the first film is aimed at an older audience then so too should subsequent entries in the same franchise....unless anyone can see a hole in my logic.
Enter your email address to join: