snappahead
Super Freak
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2011
- Messages
- 3,256
- Reaction score
- 4
EA did Dead Space. To me this is good news.
You must not have ever played any of their licensed games. They're a celebration of a$$.
EA did Dead Space. To me this is good news.
You must not have ever played any of their licensed games. They're a celebration of a$$.
Question: Was 1313 suposed to be like a sequel to Bounty Hunter?
Yes. I liked the storyline and the tone from the previews. If the gameplay had been solid it would have been exactly what Lucasarts needed.
Battlefield: Star Wars
The Walt Disney Company has a licensing agreement with Electronic Arts.
"Get ready for micro transactions out the Wookie a$$, chapters and levels cut for later sale as DLC and hurried products to meet quartly goals. Bend over gamers, we're about to get a lightsaber enema.
So basically what Lucasarts did for the past 13 years?
No.
To wit,
LucasArts = Bumbling Incompetence
EA = Systematic Evil
https://i.chzbgr.com/maxW500/6328276224/hCAEE5C3D/
While I agree, in EA's defense almost every publisher seems to be that greedy now.
EA makes some good games. They also LOVE microtransactions, and they love DRM. They've been known to seriously rush out stuff too - I mean, ME3 is a beautiful looking game, that's deeply flawed. Dead Space 3 is another great looking game that has some issues (easy as hell being the main), so this news is very, very, very MIXED
While I agree, in EA's defense almost every publisher seems to be that greedy now.
EA's realistically the best choice, so I'm ok with it.
Care to explain that?
Enter your email address to join: