Real world CIA black ops. All the actors were on par, cinematography and a story that is gripping. Second one felt like the story wasn't quite as sharp nor gripping.What did you like about Sicario?
Real world CIA black ops. All the actors were on par, cinematography and a story that is gripping. Second one felt like the story wasn't quite as sharp nor gripping.What did you like about Sicario?
I liked Benicio and Brolin. The sequel should have been about them and their crew doing cool ****.What did you like about Sicario?
What was illogical about it?Completely illogical ending. Killed it for me.
I hate deserts
What was illogical about it?
The whole assault plan with Brolin was unnecessary considering Benecio just hijacked a car elsewhere.
Also, the drug lord has dinner with his family expecting someone he doesn't trust and he only has like 6 guards.
Also, the whole "we need your signature" from newbie Emily Blunt.
Yeah, well. It's a movie.
Villenavenue has some deep context movies. I'd have to watch it again, but I just thought Del Toro needed to extract some guy with info, they went to snuff out a drug distribution place as a cover to get Del Toro to the drug lord who might have thought he was untouchable.The whole assault plan with Brolin was unnecessary considering Benecio just hijacked a car elsewhere.
Also, the drug lord has dinner with his family expecting someone he doesn't trust and he only has like 6 guards.
Part of the government process. Paperwork amongst paperwork.Also, the whole "we need your signature" from newbie Emily Blunt.
Villenavenue has some deep context movies. I'd have to watch it again, but I just thought Del Toro needed to extract some guy with info, they went to snuff out a drug distribution place as a cover to get Del Toro to the drug lord who might have thought he was untouchable.
Part of the government process. Paperwork amongst paperwork.
Is that sand coming out of his... ?
Maybe it's going in.Is that sand coming out of his... ?
You don't need to adapt the fourth book to reach the anti-colonialist themes or subversion of the white savior trope. That's already present in the second half of the first book, as well as the second book.I’m sure the new Dune might be a mildly entertaining popcorn flick that might get a sequel. As a whole, unless a filmmaker is ready to reverse engineer the film from at least the fourth book to the first, then they will make a bunch of decisions in adapting the front end that will turn into very problematic story telling, world building, and philosophical messaging later on.
For example, if you only look at updating the first book, you could say that there are ‘problematic colonial themes of an outside white person needing to save an indigenous people.’ ... However, if you start blocking out the story from the point of view that Paul will end up as God Emperor multiple generations in the future, then the analysis changes. Dune’s themes aren’t a problematic feature of a book from 1965. It is the freaking point. You want to jump forward 3,500 years to a dystopian future where the savior is now the tyrant.
Which could be why Villeneuve is already on the PR path of advertising Chani as his part 2 heroine.
He's not in the film.Who plays Feyd?
Enter your email address to join: