Emma Frost PF
- Thread starter Karma
- Start date
Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:
jinxx
Super Freak
I concur.
For shame. Funny thing is, she's about the same height as She-Hulk without the base.
creature4000
Super Freak
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2006
- Messages
- 9,586
- Reaction score
- 7
this would have been perfect with a different face.
iron.jedi83
Super Freak
thanks for the pictures jlprjlpr, got two flex payments to go and i will proudly display this piece in my collection next to CIM, SIM, and X-23
:chew
:chew
daikkenaurora
Super Freak
Agree. The body is okay but that face... what a face.
ugh!Can someone photoshop The Emma comiquette head in place of the PF's please.
jinxx
Super Freak
Actually, the body is not okay. The shoulders are sooo awkward when you're viewing it from the bottom!
quadcent
Super Freak
daikkenaurora
Super Freak
Actually, the body is not okay. The shoulders are sooo awkward when you're viewing it from the bottom!
You look at statues from the bottom? If so Why? Are you magical?
Havok
Super Freak
Well as someone who loves J. Scott Campbell's artwork, I think it's a good representation in statue form. Maybe it's not perfect but it isn't bad either. Sideshow didn't just decide to make the face on this cartoon style out of the blue, they based it off of something very specific.
So for those who think the face is terrible on this one, you might want to check out the original artwork before you pass judgment. I know it was one of his X-Men covers, I'm just not sure which one. Congrats to those who got Emma!
So for those who think the face is terrible on this one, you might want to check out the original artwork before you pass judgment. I know it was one of his X-Men covers, I'm just not sure which one. Congrats to those who got Emma!
Mesa
Super Freak
I don't understand the most recent backlash against this statue. Looks like the same crappy pics we saw from the PO. Actually, since it looks the same and didn't get any worse in post prototype, at least those who bought it got what they expected.
Personally, I don't care for it now and didn't care for it when premiered.
devilof76
Super Freak
It is a good representation of the art. If someone were a fan of the artist, I don't see how they would not like the statue. And she's very cute, in a Bratz doll sort of way.
I can see one improvement over the prototype, and that's her eyes. What a brilliant shade of blue.
I can see one improvement over the prototype, and that's her eyes. What a brilliant shade of blue.
The Mike
In the Pixels
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2006
- Messages
- 30,607
- Reaction score
- 82
I love J Scott Campbell's work. This doesn't NOT do it any proper justice. Look at this piece in its final shipped form and then at the cover.
Horrid. Even with his stylized designs, it doesn't look anything like this Bratz doll.
The funny thing his styling can be captured in 3D. Why Sideshow failed I'll never figure out.
Horrid. Even with his stylized designs, it doesn't look anything like this Bratz doll.
The funny thing his styling can be captured in 3D. Why Sideshow failed I'll never figure out.
devilof76
Super Freak
I love J Scott Campbell's work. This doesn't NOT do it any proper justice. Look at this piece in its final shipped form and then at the cover.
Horrid. Even with his stylized designs, it doesn't look anything like this Bratz doll.
Oh. You're right. I had no idea. I never liked Campbell, so I just assumed. The cover is much better.
jlprjlpr
Super Freak
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2009
- Messages
- 573
- Reaction score
- 0
I was not familiar with J Scott Campbell's work. I just bought it because I'm a completist so I buy them all but honestly didn't like it.
Having now seen Campbell's art. I think the statue is a very good representation of his art.
Having said that, I now think his art and the statue's face based on the art are both ugly, UGLY!
Having now seen Campbell's art. I think the statue is a very good representation of his art.
Having said that, I now think his art and the statue's face based on the art are both ugly, UGLY!
jinxx
Super Freak
Well as someone who loves J. Scott Campbell's artwork, I think it's a good representation in statue form. Maybe it's not perfect but it isn't bad either. Sideshow didn't just decide to make the face on this cartoon style out of the blue, they based it off of something very specific.
So for those who think the face is terrible on this one, you might want to check out the original artwork before you pass judgment. I know it was one of his X-Men covers, I'm just not sure which one. Congrats to those who got Emma!
Well, I have the comic book(X-men/Messiah Complex 205 variant edition). Loved it then and still do but I can't say the same thing about the PF. I had to cancel because it's a fail IMO. Anyway, for someone who loves Campbell's work and thinks it's a good representation in statue form, this PF is a must in your collection. So could you provide pics of yours, please?
jlprjlpr
Super Freak
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2009
- Messages
- 573
- Reaction score
- 0
I already posted photos, they are in this thread between posts 1197 to 1201
Personally I don't like the cartoony anime-like type of comic art.
I grew up with Neil Adams, Jim Aparo, Barry Smith, etc. so this stuff looks like its drawn for 5 year olds to me.
jinxx
Super Freak
No, not you. Havok.....doubt it, though.
ecekat
Super Freak
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2008
- Messages
- 4,097
- Reaction score
- 0
daikkenaurora
Super Freak
Booooooooo
Similar threads
