EXO-6 Star Trek "The Wrath of Khan" Figures

[IBM5100]

Beautiful box art but I wonder why they ditched the II for Star Trek II The Wrath of Khan.

 

[Stryker2011]

What part?

I think we all know which part.

 

[Make It Go]

A work of art for sure. I wonder what that caption in the background with the Ent-D engineering section is about?

 

[S. Griffin]

Beautiful box art but I wonder why they ditched the II for Star Trek II The Wrath of Khan.

It's a bit odd, but there's precedent. The novelization did that.

Also, apparently the the 70mm prints of the film shown in theaters (in 1982 and in later rescreenings) did not have the "II" in the title.

 

[IBM5100]

It's a bit odd, but there's precedent. The novelization did that.
View attachment 737354

Also, apparently the the 70mm prints of the film shown in theaters (in 1982 and in later rescreenings) did not have the "II" in the title.

Very interesting, I didn't know that.

 

[Make It Go]

 

[dondiegomasked]

Beautiful box art but I wonder why they ditched the II for Star Trek II The Wrath of Khan.

If they put a “II” on the box it would look out of place with the other Trek boxes. Who’s looking for a Kirk figure from “Star Trek V” anyway?

Z

 

[QuiGonFishing]

Also, part of me “noticed” when she changed her hair….

View attachment 737277

What part?

I think we all know which part.

The Logic and Data Processing sections of my Frontal Cortex........Obviously

 

[davejames]

She looks awesome there.

 

[QuiGonFishing]

 

[davejames]

Feeling better now about my decision to order two of these.