LOL, no kidding. I think it looks fantastic. Thing is perfect.
Fantastic Four - November 6, 2024
- Thread starter MyenShi
- Start date
Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:
Looks really good. I'm actually interested in an mcu movie again!
ScoobyDoo
Super Freak
- Joined
- Dec 25, 2018
- Messages
- 982
- Reaction score
- 1,979
Well, I was excited for this. Especially after the dumpster fire of the last F4 movie. But this deflated me. Maybe because as a kid the 2005 movie was so damn cool. I’ll probably go see this, but the trailer didn’t do anything for me. I like Pedro Pascal, so I’ll probably see this just to see him lol. He made Wonder Woman 84 watchable.
Dark_Knight_89
Super Freak
This was always going to be the movie that drew fans back in if they bailed after the conclusion of Phase 3 (myself included).
ScoobyDoo
Super Freak
- Joined
- Dec 25, 2018
- Messages
- 982
- Reaction score
- 1,979
Are different opinions not allowed anymore?
You shouldn't let other peoples opinions affect your own excitement..
Every VFX shot in this trailer looks horrible or uncanny to me. You can tell exactly which shots where filmed on a volume or green/blue screen. I don't want to be able to tell. My brain picks up on it too easily, can't not see it.
abake
Rex Tremendae Majestatis
I'm surprised, I really liked it.
I will definitely be watching this in the theatre.
I will definitely be watching this in the theatre.
Looks decent enough so far. The period piece will at least make this one more unique than a lot of what we’ve had recently with the MCU. Seeing Galactus’ helmet being the correct shape and not a cloud is already an improvement. Just curious how they’ll get from the 60’s to modern time and explain why they’ve never been brought up before. Probably just lame multiverse stuff, right?
I don't think it's in the 60's. It's retro-futuristic and set in a different timeline. The Fantastic Four doesn't exist in the main MCU timeline.
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2006
- Messages
- 8,898
- Reaction score
- 1,749
I would've preferred a bit more modulation in Thing's voice, a bit more ... ahem ... gravelly ah-thank you very much
loki2371
Super Freak
The Thing looks surprisingly good..... But that voice... 
As soon as he speaks he ruins the visuals. And Galactus looks good from what we saw. But the minute the She-Surfer comes on screen, I'd be out, regardless of how good Galactus is.
Johnny and Sue may be decent enough. But sorry, I will never falter on Pedro being an utterly horrible choice for Reed.
As soon as he speaks he ruins the visuals. And Galactus looks good from what we saw. But the minute the She-Surfer comes on screen, I'd be out, regardless of how good Galactus is.Johnny and Sue may be decent enough. But sorry, I will never falter on Pedro being an utterly horrible choice for Reed.
jye4ever
Broke and happy
Pedro fail as RR.
Thing’s overall design is perfect BUT that voice WTF!
Plus the CGI facial expressions looked weird.
Otherwise overall F4 vibe I still give a positive approval that would be so much better had it not been for PP.
Thing’s overall design is perfect BUT that voice WTF!
Plus the CGI facial expressions looked weird.
Otherwise overall F4 vibe I still give a positive approval that would be so much better had it not been for PP.
Last edited:
Star-Crunch
Super Freak
- Joined
- May 9, 2017
- Messages
- 2,770
- Reaction score
- 482
Cautiously optimistic
LSD Woman
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2016
- Messages
- 5,603
- Reaction score
- 5,643
The two things that really ruined this trailer for me are the awful SS shot and Pedro’s line delivery. Tbh I didn’t notice Thing’s voice. Otherwise it looked kinda cool. Galactus looks awesome.
More interest in Buffy reboot than this it seems 
Is it weird they didn't show off Mr F. stretching?
Normally The Thing is the one part they screw up and now it appears just the opposite, lol.
