Free Loki!

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Man, I'm sick of Loki. He is like that popular song it gets played on the radio a million times until you cannot take it anymore.
 
A Loki stand alone film would bomb unless all of the fangirls go back to see it 100 times each.
 
That's what I'm saying. Just cause tumblr and fangirls like to *** to Tom hiddleston doesn't mean the rest of the world wants to. None of these people didn't even know who loki was til the avengers. He's a cool character but come on.
 
Just to clarify, I don't care either way but to Marvel it would be a huge opportunity gone by. We'll see or at least have it confirmed that they are in it for the money. Howard the Duck 2?
 
wait a minute, is someone giving away a free Loki figure or something?
I don't get it
 
Just to clarify, I don't care either way but to Marvel it would be a huge opportunity gone by. We'll see or at least have it confirmed that they are in it for the money. Howard the Duck 2?

Marvel will let it pass. There are far better money making opportunities that they can't even get on the table with their limited resources, that they're having to schedule in well down the line so it all plays out consistently with what they've already established.
 
Marvel will let it pass. There are far better money making opportunities that they can't even get on the table with their limited resources, that they're having to schedule in well down the line so it all plays out consistently with what they've already established.

I bet more people would like to see a Loki film, than are lining up to see Ant Man - of all people to make a movie about, sheesh.

Someone else: That's what I'm saying. Just cause tumblr and fangirls like to *** to Tom hiddleston doesn't mean the rest of the world wants to. None of these people didn't even know who loki was til the avengers. He's a cool character but come on.

I bet Marvel likes all US currency, its all green and Marvel don't care if its coming from a fangirl, or from a "serious fan." Money is money. It all spends equally.

Now with all that said, I don't think we will be getting a Loki standalone. But I don't view you people as somehow superior because you enjoy female eye-candy. As I recall regarding Black Widow in Avengers, it was all "ooooo dat @ss!" - and yet women looking at Hiddleston is somehow wrong and uncool. Ha, nice dichotomy you got going on there.
 
Can Ben Affleck play Loki?

I guess you haven't been reading. Tom Hiddleston is the draw. Ben Aflac couldn't draw himself out of a third grade crayola competition.

tumblr_inline_mqek53YowN1qz4rgp.png
 
I bet more people would like to see a Loki film, than are lining up to see Ant Man - of all people to make a movie about, sheesh.

I bet Marvel likes all US currency, its all green and Marvel don't care if its coming from a fangirl, or from a "serious fan." Money is money. It all spends equally.

Now with all that said, I don't think we will be getting a Loki standalone. But I don't view you people as somehow superior because you enjoy female eye-candy. As I recall regarding Black Widow in Avengers, it was all "ooooo dat @ss!" - and yet women looking at Hiddleston is somehow wrong and uncool. Ha, nice dichotomy you got going on there.

If it was all about money, they'd keep doing Iron Man films. The fact that they even agreed to cut him back to a secondary character who'll only appear in the next two Avengers completely goes against any "theory" you've proposed. Your argument is invalid.
 
Like a boss.

ku-medium.jpg


p.s. they're not doing more IM films not because they are tired of IM, but because AFAIK Downey's contract for standalone IM films ran out. Invalid.

Not to mention, they just went back and shot more scenes with Hiddleston due solely to fan's demand for more of the character. Ooops! Inconvenient invalidation! ;)
 
If it was all about money, they'd keep doing Iron Man films. The fact that they even agreed to cut him back to a secondary character who'll only appear in the next two Avengers completely goes against any "theory" you've proposed. Your argument is invalid.

And yet Marvel is under contract to pay RDJ more money to play IM in A2 and A3 than he made off of the three IM movies combined. Money is the only argument.
 
I bet more people would like to see a Loki film, than are lining up to see Ant Man - of all people to make a movie about, sheesh.



I bet Marvel likes all US currency, its all green and Marvel don't care if its coming from a fangirl, or from a "serious fan." Money is money. It all spends equally.

Now with all that said, I don't think we will be getting a Loki standalone. But I don't view you people as somehow superior because you enjoy female eye-candy. As I recall regarding Black Widow in Avengers, it was all "ooooo dat @ss!" - and yet women looking at Hiddleston is somehow wrong and uncool. Ha, nice dichotomy you got going on there.


You gotta admit. Scar Jo got dat *** don't she. It's like damn baby how can you fit all that in that suit?
 
Back
Top