jlcmsu said:
Did I say anything about post counts? No, I didn't. I just said that coming in acting like an assehole is no way to get people to wanna chat with ya.
Coming and acting like an assehole? Are you are talking about you here?
I didn't offend anyone, I'm just talking about statues. You said I looked like an assehole first. Maybe the assehole it's you, not me?
jlcmsu said:
I'm in no way in a bad position to judge.
Maybe bad isn't the really right word. Lets just say your position is not as good as someone that saw them in person, that's for sure, you want it or not.
jlcmsu said:
We all know that these statues be it SS, GG, Attakus, etc. look better in person.
Sometimes they looks worse. Who's the newbie?
Pictures are bad to really judge something. Principally when you call something crap or say it looks really bad without even seen it. To call something CRAP, terrible or bad, yes, you have to see it in person, otherwise your opinion will be not as precise than someone that saw the piece in question.
jlcmsu said:
It's his opinion based on the info he has which IMO is worth what everyones is.
I've lurked here before, never saw this guy saying anything bad about GG. He's biased, and even worse, he never saw the other pieces he bad judges. So yes, his opinion it's very doubtfull. I've seen and collected the pieces in question, so my judgment it's a little more truthful and not as biased. GG makes good things. SW statues are not one of them.
jlcmsu said:
Well, I know I'd pay the money for the SS version before the Attakus and I much prefer statues to the items with real cloth. It's a better looking piece, made better, and has kick ass details. Not that the Attakus is dog crap just not as good as the SS. I disagree with you on the Vader 1 but I think that's pretty obvious.
That's an opinion there, even tough I really don't think you've seen Attakus first Vader in person and don't agree with you. I also would never pay $100 for the Balrog, unless I was going to sell it on ebay for people like you to buy
jlcmsu said:
Cause, I wanted to bring up the BEST Vader representation since we where talking about that. I'll use your logic then. Have you seen it in person or just pics?
Yes, I saw it IN PERSON at the last comic con.
Sorry. And yes, the cape looks bad, the saber it's too short and the hands position doesn' look right either. And I don't like the chest armor covered by his robe. But I will end up getting to go with Obi-Wan. It's cheap, so why not get it? And will looks awesome together with Obi. But the pose is not as good as the Attakus, not as powerfull.
jlcmsu said:
Cause if you haven't seen it in person then the opinion you bring to the table means crap.
I saw it. Sorry kid.
jlcmsu said:
That's the thing I like about the Attakus Vader more it has all the nice little details you saw in the film.
Yes.
jlcmsu said:
I'm not going to get into a pissing contest with a newbie. Yes, I do have a job.
I work for a local school district. So yes I go out and buy what I think is the best which is why I've added the tiny Balrog as you put it and the Witch King statue in the last month.
Please don't go into the pissing contest. That's why you probably have over than 10k posts.
Newbie? Just cause I recently loged in? Wow, how inteligent you are.
Just cause you stay here all day long, posting here, you call other people newbies? I really doubt you have a job based on your post counts.
And let me tell you what a newbie is:
Are you a true LOTR fan? Cause if you are, where were you when those tiny pieces were released?(and for cheap) Most of the true collectors and fans I know were in line to buy those pieces for $300 when they got released.
Paying 2k for a piece, in the hands of ebay scalpers doesn't make you any better collector than anyone. Makes you a NEWBIE.
Bye-bye.
PS: You said you wouldn't get into a pissing contest with a newbie, so make your words prevail and don't answer back. I know I won't answer you anymore, and I do keep my word. Let's see if you can keep yours.