Hatfields & McCoys

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
One of my former students is a Hatfield. I guess it would be a bad idea to introduce you two!
 
Been waiting on this awhile, love the casting, hope the story matches expectations.
 
You obviously haven't watched too many movies with different directors takes on things. :cuckoo:

I am not sure I follow you. Sure they might 'pony' it up a bit but surely the story is the story :dunno

How will that not meet peoples expectations? I guess it is airing on the HISTORY channel for a reason.

Read the interview I posted above with Costner, I think that will answer your doubts.

When dramatic license must be taken to tell a story in this medium, how historically accurate can you be?

COSTNER: We ran into that. You want to be accurate, and you should be, but when you make a movie, there are going to be leaps, and we had to make some. Sometimes you make them theatrically, and sometimes you make them because nobody really knows. You have to go, “Well, what did start it?,” and you touch on a few things that could have started the feud. There were times where we had to compress. I never like to stick my neck so far out on the line and say, “This is absolutely authentic,” but its whole bent is towards authenticity and the participants. Time was compressed over 20 or 30 years. It’s important to me to be accurate, but it can tie you in knots, to the point where you can’t tell your story. Its aim was true. I’m sure that people could find fault with a measure of certain details.
 
Well, what was I thinking, writers and directors have nothing to do with how a movie turns out. Why do they keep remaking movies? I'm sure Ridley Scotts Robin Hood is exactly like the one Kevin Costner made to you, right? Just like Tim Burton's Dark Shadows is probably so true to the source material that people are rocking out as if its the 70s again.

You act like the details and dialogue are inconsequential, when in fact they generally make or break a movie. What you posted only reinforces my point. Costner says it himself "was compressed over 20 or 30 years. It’s important to me to be accurate, but it can tie you in knots" I am sure there was alot of decision made as what would remain and what wouldn't as well as what would be entertaining and what wouldn't. Don't even know why it interests you since you seem to know it all already.
 
No, actually I know very little about this historical episode. That is why I will watch it and expect that the director over six hours will do the best he can. Like I say I am sure they will 'pony' it up but that does not mean it won't be faithful to the source.
 
Yeah, think theyre doing a special on Pawn Stars with Hatfield/McCoy items to lead into this. Can't wait. :clap
 
Anyone watch this tonight?

First episode was decent. Had a TV vibe to it with a few cheesy parts. Still, if you like history, war, western it is pretty good.

Costner and Paxton make it entertaining. Probably wouldn't be as good with no name actors. Powers Booth is an awesome judge!
 
They did a good job with Costner's character. From the commercials I thought the character would be very one dimensional and I think hes actually been pretty balanced so far. He may not make every right decision, but he sure seems intent on keeping as much peace as possible. As bad a the McCoys say they have it,
Costner has already eaten his son getting shot and losing a cousin due to the McCoy kids being pure jackasses.

Too bad Powers Booth didn't get a bigger role. :(
 
Back
Top