InArt: 1/6 Superman (Cavill)

[T8OO]

I don't know why anyone would want to spend this kind of money to turn around and ruin it by painting it ...

One person's ruined is another person's improvement.

 

[Pizza]

 

[Gipetto0812]

Amazing pics as always @Pizza

_______
Pretty cool dioram base being offered at OSK for $260 if anyone has the space

https://onesixthkit.com/index.php?route=product/product&product_id=5954

 

[T8OO]

Amazing pics as always @Pizza

_______
Pretty cool dioram base being offered at OSK for $260 if anyone has the space

https://onesixthkit.com/index.php?route=product/product&product_id=5954

I really like that base. Other than the stupidly placed "monument" part.

 

[rory]

I'll end up displaying these two together for now. But man, HT's Batman is so overly beefy and exaggerated compared to InArt's Superman. Throws it off a little bit.

 

[HyperDrive]

This Superman figure looks best with some side-eye action. When people have him looking head-on like this, I can see why people say the likeness is off.

Hoping INART manages to capture realistic, more accurate proportions for Batman vs these oversized Hot Toys bodies.

 

[Redditeer28]

This Superman figure looks best with some side-eye action.

Watch out, you're starting to sound a lot like Justin.

 

[Bjjer]

Batman was that beefy though

 

[rory]

Batman was that beefy though

Yeah but he's oversized compared to InArt's Supes. His hands and feet are twice the size of Supe's. It's a bit exaggerated. I mean I'm happy to have the whole trinity lineup. But Batman looks gigantic next to the other two.

 

[Nine Inch Nails]

I dont think its fair to compare a figure that came out before 2020 to a figure that is now. Now if this was the 2.0, I'd get it.

 

[Hologram AI]

I dont think its fair to compare a figure that came out before 2020 to a figure that is now. Now if this was the 2.0, I'd get it.

Their 2.0 looks worse to me. They made him even bigger while also changing details to be more inaccurate. Honestly, I think you're better off comparing with their 1.0. Kind of scared to see how big they make their 2.0 Cavill Superman if Batman is anything to go by.

Mister Thunder Thighs over here.

 

[HyperDrive]

I didn’t want to be the one to say it lol, but yeah, the HT BvS 2.0 is worse. Incredibly over-scaled. The proportions aren’t the only thing that are wrong with the BvS 2.0 too.

 

[rory]

I’m keeping my fingers crossed that they made improvements on this before going into production. Because the promo photos of this figure looked terrible.

Their 2.0 looks worse to me. They made him even bigger while also changing details to be more inaccurate. Honestly, I think you're better off comparing with their 1.0. Kind of scared to see how big they make their 2.0 Cavill Superman if Batman is anything to go by.

Mister Thunder Thighs over here.

 

[Scout Trooper]

I'll end up displaying these two together for now. But man, HT's Batman is so overly beefy and exaggerated compared to InArt's Superman. Throws it off a little bit.

View attachment 752630

Pairs better with the armored figure I think

 

[shadows]

Yeah but he's oversized compared to InArt's Supes. His hands and feet are twice the size of Supe's. It's a bit exaggerated. I mean I'm happy to have the whole trinity lineup. But Batman looks gigantic next to the other two. View attachment 752673

Does Batfleck look oversized compared to WW? Both HT products.

 

[JorjeCroft]

I don’t think HH Batman is too beefy, InArt Superman is just to the slimmer side overall. Ben was on a beast mode in that movie. I wonder since Batman 2.0 is larger and taller than the original release, will HT Superman 2.0 also be larger and taller? That gonna make him larger than InArt one. I guess HT artists work overnight to craft the perfect body lol I think they can outdo InArt in that department.

 

[Bjjer]

What I'm afraid of when I bought the Inarr that Superman 2.0 is gonna blow it away.