InArt Christopher Reeve Superman/Clark Kent

[davejames]

Yeah despite my issues with them (mostly with the proportions being a bit wonky), my Inart figures are still far superior to the HT versions. But that said, I still think HT could knock it out of the park with a new Reeve Superman, judging by how great these Flash figures are looking. At least if they put the same great people on it.

 

[HyperDrive]

all my INART figs make my HTs look really toyish.

 

[Aybaig]

all my INART figs make my HTs look really toyish.

Sad, but absolutely true.

 

[More Battle Damage]

If both companies are making the same figure I'd choose InArt every time.

choosing inArt and waiting for them are two totally different things. I waited for the Batman and it was worth it in the end, but painful

 

[HyperDrive]

choosing inArt and waiting for them are two totally different things.

#waitforinart is real

 

[shadows]

Complaining about Inart not putting out product fast enough isn’t really an issue for me. I’ll gladly pace my wallet spending vs deciding to PO a few bangers HT puts out every week.

I want a Reeve Supes but not enough to pay $1000, I don’t need a Clark. Offer a single release for Supes or I’ll get the HT 2.0 for cheaper.

One small thing is about the accessories, the newspaper would stay in the box cus I wouldn’t have Clark crunch it up by holding it, and the kryptonite necklace won’t match the Supes facial expression if we don’t get a pained sculpt look.

 

[shadows]

all my INART figs make my HTs look really toyish.

I really do think Inarts paint apps are much better enabling them to make it look like a real person especially the pupils in the eyes and skin texture - Paul Atriedes, Joaquin, Henry Cavill are superb.

I’ll get sh*t for this but if I compare them to HT newest Ledger Joker, first of all, it’s amazing and one of HT’s best ever, but I’ve seen it in-person and the paint could still look more realistic imo.