Not the greatest examples, but it’s like the Hot Toys BOBF based Cad Bane + Todo. We never see Todo in BOBF but Hot Toys included Todo in the set. Doesn’t make the Cad Bane figure itself inaccurate.
As far as the part one Paul with hooks is concerned, any collector that didn’t want to use them could simply choose to leave them in the box couldn’t they?
As long as things that would make a figure inaccurate are included as accessories or add in packs I fail to see the problem.
I had a feeling you’d bring that up as a “gotcha!” But that’s different. The entire figure is accurate to Part 1. Extra add-ons like that don’t make the rest of it inaccurate if they’re not being utilized. You can choose to display it like that and sure, that’d be inaccurate but doesn’t make the whole set inaccurate.
An accessory pack + current Paul figure still doesn’t make for an accurate Part 2 Paul.
Bleah, these are different scenarios.Exactly. His/her contention is that doing an OPTIONAL accessory pack that includes a part 2 Paul headsculpt, brown robes, water of life, etc. is a no-no and is a point against Inart's claim or goal of accuracy. Meanwhile, these part 2 accessories included are ok or seems to be given a pass.
Yeah, you can leave it in the box. It still makes the whole package and advertising inaccurate by your measure which Inart shouldn't be doing. At the same time, you can opt not to buy that accessory pack if it ever materializes and let those that want it, do whatever they want.
That accessory pack doesn’t make for an accurate Part 2 Paul. Simple as that. We’re seriously going to be satisfied with that?
The only thing that is missing if inart sells a part 2 accessory with a headsculpt, robe, or whatever, is dirt. Maybe inart should include a bottle of sand with spice as well. Lol!
Joking aside, you are free to keep it as a part 1 only. Nobody is stopping you. Nobody is getting upset about it. You shouldn't be likewise if they want it the other way. It's not a big inaccurate detail with a dirty stillsuit or a clean stillsuit. For me, I'm not much into the weathered look for figures. A clean stillsuit with all other part 2 details correct works for me and others as it would seem. They will most likely weather/dirty the suit themselves.
Just dump the still suit in a sand box for a few hot summer days for that part 2 accuracy when you get this bad boy.
@hyperaccuracydrive All companies aim for accuracy but they all fall short depending what matters to you or what you're looking for. Some do really come out inaccurate, no debate.
Inart's Jokor is accurate to me but the experts would say otherwise starting with the coat details, shirt details, etc. Gandalf doesn't have that inscription on his clothing. From my understanding, there's a lot of back and forth in the approval process with WB and even with that, it seems like more of a process with WB rather than scrutinizing the details.
Yes, there's also the money part. Accessories will be cheaper than another full set. Inart prices are quite high for a lot so buying 2 would be out of the question. Also, there really isn't any guarantee that Inart will be making more dune figures.
I really think you shouldn't be so hung up on it. My perspective and others, from my assumption, is that a dirty look is the only thing separating a complete Dune 2 look if the accessory/headsculpt pack happens.
And you didn’t even acknowledge how expensive a P2 Paul head-sculpt would be. Like I said, at that point, shouldn’t they just go all the way…? I don’t think it’s as financially viable as everyone is making it seem.
I get what you're saying but I also see the other side of it where people are being content with part 1 version + adding on the blue eyes and his cloak. Although for some reason it does seem like people don't care as much with this than if it was another character.It’s more about the collective wanting INART to produce something that’s objectively inaccurate. That’s disappointing to me if that’s what we get for a Dune 2 look. I myself want a Part 2 Paul rather than Part 1…….
And you didn’t even acknowledge how expensive a P2 Paul head-sculpt would be. Like I said, at that point, shouldn’t they just go all the way…? I don’t think it’s as financially viable as everyone is making it seem.
Gandalf didn’t have inscription on his pants based on reference images. And even fellow Collector Freak users came to that conclusion as well. All based on hearsay based on people who have presumably seen the actual suit on set per articles I read written in 2008. That whole #missingpantsprints Pantsgate debacle was just baloney spearheaded by a YouTuber basing his entire gripe with INART on that same hearsay. Ledger Joker isn’t accurate as it could be, but nothing ever is when certain details or whatnot can’t be replicated in 1/6. Also, Joker’s production run was during the days when INART wasn’t widely known/accepted. There weren’t people offering constructive feedback like there are now. Quite frankly, I fail to see how that’s relevant to this Paul figure as it’s different, it’s certainly achievable to make an accurate Part 2 Paul. These companies aim for accuracy like you mentioned, but why are we supporting the idea of an intentional inaccurate thing?
I saw this coming. Ideally, this should’ve been Part 2 Paul.
I get what you're saying but I also see the other side of it where people are being content with part 1 version + adding on the blue eyes and his cloak. Although for some reason it does seem like people don't care as much with this than if it was another character.
Given if this was Hot Toys and they gave a half assed in-between mix matched figure that made no sense, people would 100% be bitching that they should have done it properly. I think the mindset, at least to me, is that most are already happy with how this figure looks. Most have already have POd it as well. Now do those same folks want to spend another $500 for a Part 2 version or is getting the eyes and some accessories enough? I'm guessing most are okay with the latter here. I do get your want for it being a complete accurate version though.
It's not going to be accurate regardless, my man. For one thing, they have that weird button on the crotch that I hope will be fixed for the final release...Simply put, they’d need to release a separate figure for a completely accurate Part 2 Paul. You won’t have an accurate P2 Paul if they just do add ons. You don’t care for that? Even if you don’t, you can’t see why that’s wrong?
Again, am I really the only one taking these crazy pills?
And people seem to overestimate the demand for this “line.” These characters at the INART level wouldn’t sell no matter how much we tell ourselves they would. Imo, all you need is Paul and Chani. The two mains of the franchise, whether it’s Part 1 or ideally, Part 2.
Enter your email address to join: