Indiana Jones Temple of Doom Premium Format

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
I don't think the exclusive is a must on this one, going to make my bf order the regular from another dealer for cheaper... :lol

how come the regular is so expensive though?
 
I love it and will order cause im a huge indy fan. The likeness is amazing yet again!

But as do many others, of course i have my small complaints too, those being, the machete looks a little too clean (and im not sure why they couldnt just wrap a small peice of cloth around his hand instead of a sculpted cloth?), rope/bridge type base wouldve suited much better, EX is ok doesnt really bug me, but the sankara stone in the left hand is a huge disappointment, i will definately be taking mine out, but might have to figure out something else to put in his hand, the palm looks way too open to have the whip in there. Might look weird, if it stays in there at all?

Its so puzzling to me that SS can release Jack Sparrow and Luke Jedi with alternate hand, but on such a piece as Indy where he has so many weapon/artifact options as a character to hold, that they SHOULD be using an alternate hand, well, they dont.

And to think that out of all 3 indys this is the one which made sense the most who would have an extended whip, weather it is a wired poseable whip like the cinemaquette, or a whip resting on the ground. Now i dont think we will get anything like that instead we have 3 Indy PF's with curled up whips. sigh........

I wander if the people in the development team at SS are really fans?
 
They say they are but apparently they are not on the same level of obsessiveness about detail as we are. :rolleyes2
 
personally i think it looks good. minor nitpick about lack of weathering but im sure that can be added fairly painlessly once ive got the figure if it still bothers me when i have it in hand. was hoping for a rope bridge base but love the base anyway. would like to have seen better pics of the facial sculpt tho sideshow!
 
lmao at this thread, 'SS haven't made the awesome statue that was in my head, they suck'. Seriously no pleasing some people.

and which thread is that, exactly?

no one here has even so much as implied that ss "sucks". especially since pretty much everyone agrees that trevor (who works for ss by the way) did a great job and the general quality of the pf is good. having issues with a prototype and conveying them in a constructive and rational manner are entirely valid. especially in a forum.

noob.
 
I really like the pose, but I agree that the sankara stone in his left hand looks odd...even a closed fist would have been better. I really don't like the base either...it looks really tacky IMO with all the skulls on it...rope bridge base was definitely the way to go but nevermind. The sculpt is fantastic though, another great piece of work by Trevor! I hope we see TOD Indy in 1/6th soon.
 
OK, I decided to take a full day to let it soak in before posting. Initially, I wasn't as 'wowed' as I was hoping I'd be when I first saw the pics. Simply because like most of us here, I had my own picture in mind that included the pillar and part of the rope-bridge as the base. I figured if Jack Sparrow could have such an elaborate and tall base, why not Indy.

Anyways, the figure has definitely grown on me. I like the pose, similar to the Aragorn with the stride...and nowhere near as awkward looking as the Luke Jedi PF pose. I understand that they made the base with the skulls to tie it to 'Doom' and the Mola-Ram PF, but I think an exterior scene base would have been better. I also think a round base would have been nicer too. Aragorn is on a round base in a similar pose and it works great. I find the rectangular base a little less elegant, not to mention, it'll be a bit of a shelf hog.

As for the stone, well, it looks to be removable, so hopefully there's a way to have Indy hold either a spooled whip or a custom unfurled whip in that hand and not look to awkward. Another missed opportunity like how they should have included a switch-out hand on the ROTLA PF to have Indy holding his revolver in the hand that hold's the idol. How come all these switch-out possibilities for Jack, but never for Indy? :cuckoo:

As for the Exclusive, it's kinda fun and neat, and I can see why they did it. Not scene specific, but something goofy that will go well with Mola-Ram's chalice. Basically something that SS likes that they know they'll never make a 1:1 prop of, so here's their chance to make one...
 
and which thread is that, exactly?

no one here has even so much as implied that ss "sucks". especially since pretty much everyone agrees that trevor (who works for ss by the way) did a great job and the general quality of the pf is good. having issues with a prototype and conveying them in a constructive and rational manner are entirely valid. especially in a forum.

noob.

He made a valid point. While I haven't seen anyone say it "sucks" the posts stating "SSC doesn't know Indy," "It isn't Indy," etc., are pretty ridiculous. Of all the PF's made by SSC only what, two or three actually represent specific scenes from movies/comics? You'd think people would have had that figured out by now. "Indy never carried a coiled whip on his belt! SSC doesn't know the character!" Please. Its a 3D collage in the tradition of the movie posters, production stills, and a zillion other film related images. It captures Indy as he appeared in Temple of Doom, and other iconic moments from the film, fantastically.

The elephants never appeared in the temple, Drew Struzan isn't a stickler for detail like we are!

indiana-jones-raiders-of-the-lost-ark-postcard.jpg


Shirt's too clean! That's not Indy!

IndianaTempleDoom.jpg


Come on now.
 
Last edited:
Khev, by now there is ample evidence to support the claim that "Sideshow just doesn't get INDY". They've basically punted on this license since Day 1. That's probably why folks are over-sensitive about details on this particular PF. I know I'm still waiting on a 100% homerun INDY collectible from them (the first Indy PF was close... Mola Ram looks like it might be it).

And it's not about being scene-specific, either. It's about the character's iconography. Ask 100 INDY aficionados if it makes more sense to display him holding either his whip or a Sankara stone, and 99 of them will say "whip" without any hesitation. The 1 is obviously one of our resident Sideshow apologists. :lol

Like I said before... overall, I like this PF. And I'll get it. But it's yet another "Oh, so close..." lesson in frustration with this license.

P.S. I don't mind the "clean" shirt, either. But the lack of stubble? Lame. Particularly lame after small_studios painted it on the prototype and they did away with it.
 
Last edited:
Khev, by now there is ample evidence to support the claim that "Sideshow just doesn't get INDY". They've basically punted on this license since Day 1. That's probably why folks are over-sensitive about details on this particular PF. I know I'm still waiting on a 100% homerun INDY collectible from them (the first Indy PF was close... Mola Ram looks like it might be it).

Questionable EX aside, the Raiders PF is about as Indy as you can get; fortunately I got one with a nice paint job. :hi5:
 
Questionable EX aside, the Raiders PF is about as Indy as you can get; fortunately I got one with a nice paint job. :hi5:

That's just the thing... most of the factory paint jobs were subpar and WAY too dark. And the Exclusive might be the lamest one in Sideshow's history (and was indeed the first indication that they might not truly understand the character/license :slap).

It was still pretty close to a home run, though. Closest, so far. But if Mola Ram doesn't get screwed up in production that PF will best it.
 
Khev, by now there is ample evidence to support the claim that "Sideshow just doesn't get INDY". They've basically punted on this license since Day 1. That's probably why folks are over-sensitive about details on this particular PF. I know I'm still waiting on a 100% homerun INDY collectible from them (the first Indy PF was close... Mola Ram looks like it might be it).

I get the bitterness over SSC's mishandling of the license overall. But I don't think that should overshadow the stellar TOD PF's (not that, as you say, anyone's really complained about Mola Ram.)

And it's not about being scene-specific, either. It's about the character's iconography. Ask 100 INDY aficionados if it makes more sense to display him holding either his whip or a Sankara stone, and 99 of them will say "whip" without any hesitation. The 1 is obviously one of our resident Sideshow apologists. :lol

Of course I have to assume you're saying I'm the SSC apologist, which is strange considering my take on many of their products over the years. Regardless, half of those "Indy aficionados" you're referencing would have probably preferred Rope Bridge Indy come with a switch out revolver hand. :duh The PF has the whip. Done. Before it was previewed I, like pretty much everyone, hoped he'd be depicted as he appeared on the bridge but was a little bummed that it'd be difficult to showcase the stones in the same scene. I like the option to put one of them in his hand. A nice touch.

Like I said before... overall, I like this PF. And I'll get it. But it's yet another "Oh, so close..." lesson in frustration with this license.

I still say this one is a home run. So many great elements from TOD, a fantastic pose and a great sculpt. Maybe an in-the-park homerun as opposed to a grand slam, but a total win nonetheless.

P.S. I don't mind the "clean" shirt, either. But the lack of stubble? Lame. Particularly lame after small_studios painted it on the prototype and they did away with it.

We'll just have to wait and see the final product. Maybe they're pulling a "GI Joe Firefly" with this one and showing a detuned head paint job before updating it before general release. The KOTCS PF turned out better in production, so its possible.

On a total side note, my excitement for this PF prompted me to pop the TOD DVD into the player last night. My wife watched it with me and right around the part where Indy was being given the blood of Kali she asked "Who made this movie again?" I said "Lucas and Spielberg, duh!" And she said, "yeah but it doesn't really feel like Spielberg, this one just seems more 'adventury' than his other movies." :lol

TOD rocks. :rock
 
I also think a round base would have been nicer too. Aragorn is on a round base in a similar pose and it works great. I find the rectangular base a little less elegant, not to mention, it'll be a bit of a shelf hog.

The angles you can display this with do seem more limited with a square base. If you want to position his face more to the front you definitely will have a less elegant and more elongated display.

Another missed opportunity like how they should have included a switch-out hand on the ROTLA PF to have Indy holding his revolver in the hand that hold's the idol. How come all these switch-out possibilities for Jack, but never for Indy? :cuckoo:

I think Indy's open sleeves prevented them from doing the switch out hands many were anticipating. I don't think they ever do that on a PF without a piece of cloth like a collar or sleeve to obscure the seem.

I know there's no chance in hell we'll see a Willie Scott PF but it'd sure be awesome to have her displayed in her sacrificial outfit flanking the Indy PF along with Mola Ram.

MolaPF.jpg
TODPF.jpg


Total win! :bow
 
Yeah but you'd still buy a Willie wouldn't you? She'd really make for a good PF (again, not that SSC would ever consider it.) Their neglect of fan-favorite Arena Padme guarantees they'd never even dream of producing a PF of one of Indy's gals.
 
Back
Top