Deak Starkiller
Super Freak
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2006
- Messages
- 14,297
- Reaction score
- 33
None of that answers my question. What about AVATAR in particular makes it a "must-see"?
Initially James Camerson's track record before Titanic?
None of that answers my question. What about AVATAR in particular makes it a "must-see"?
I beg to differ, look at the Matrix. The sequels were weak sauce but the first movie still has had a lasting impact on film as a whole.
I don't know about that.
For me those two films kinda tarnished the first one a little.
The Matrix is still a great movie though, especially if you can try and wipe the sequels from your mind
But AVATAR? In 2010? Don't get it. And the box office phenomenon has to be the sole reason it even sniffed a Best Picture Oscar, much less was even nominated.
What about AVATAR in particular makes it a "must-see"?
But we get that fairly regularly anyway. My point is that AVATAR didn't provide anything special in this regard at all. I honestly don't feel we got one of those rare once-in-a-lifetime films here. It was just another blockbuster spectacle. But a good one. Maybe because most of them nowadays are utter crap and it isn't is the reason it's being over-valued?We can all agree that it didn't give us the next Luke Skywalker, Indiana Jones, Frodo, or Buzz Lightyear. What it DID provide is the incredibly elusive combination of escapist transportation to a truly magical, alien feeling and amazing looking world and white knuckle crowd pleasing excitement.
Eh. To each his own, but I didn't get that at all here. In fact, the direct comparisons to SW (other than genre and FX) still baffle me.What we all wanted from Phantom Menace but were denied. Imagine TPM the way we wanted it to be, all the magic of that far away galaxy but with Anakin being 25 years old, Jar Jar a badass (or apparently even a hottie), and Darth Maul fleshed out with more scenes to chew and an appropriately satisfying finale. Cameron gave us that with Avatar.
What it DID provide is the incredibly elusive combination of escapist transportation...
I honestly find any fanboy drooling over Neytiri disturbing and unsettling. I mean... really??
It's too bad that Darth Maul didn't get the multilayered richness and engrossing character development that Quaritch had in Avatar.
It's too bad that Darth Maul didn't get the multilayered richness and engrossing character development that Quaritch had in Avatar.
I said imagine if Maul had been "fleshed out with more scenes to chew."
We actually know quite a bit about Quaritch as far as adventure movie villains go. We know what he did on earth, what undoubtedly shaped his outlook on Pandora the first day he set foot into the jungle, how he treats and rewards his own men, and how many options he'll let play out before he lowers the boom in his own style. He also had quite a few great scenes throughout the movie, unlike a certain high flying Sith apprentice.
Quaritch might not be the next Darth Vader, but he's definitely on the level of a Tarkin or Belloq. What more do you want?
Initially James Camerson's track record before Titanic?
Eh. To each his own, but I didn't get that at all here. In fact, the direct comparisons to SW (other than genre and FX) still baffle me.
And yet the irony is people will remember Maul longer.
Why would that baffle you? Let go of SW as a merchandising global phenomenon (because NO movie will EVER be able to compare to THAT) and think of it as just a movie going experience. Lots of movies have been given direct comparisons in that regard, and it usually is quite laughable. I remember when Stargate was quoted as "Indiana Jones meets Star Wars."
And the Fifth Element, Independence Day, even last year's Star Trek. It really happens quite frequently. But the only movies to truly live up to the comparisons IMO have been Jurassic Park, LOTR, and Avatar. Obviously the visuals have a lot to do with it. And as far as those are concerned, if you can really pop in the Blu-ray and watch the scene where Jake kneels before the Tree of Souls and prays to Eywa and tell me that isn't the most amazingly realized SFX character in the history of cinema (visually speaking of course) then I don't know what to say. If someone were to cross their arms in 1977 and say "what's so special about any of these visuals?" while watching SW you just have to resign to the fact that there really isn't any verbal convincing that will actually do any good. That's just what I believe the rest of the world "got" when they saw Avatar. If that still baffles you then I don't know what else to say.
Can't argue with that.
Actually, I've seen some Japanese 3D CG work that puts it to shame. But that stuff seldom, if ever, gets a theatrical release here in the states.
Obviously I (and the movie going public) can only compare it to movies that we actually have access to. What CG are you referring to? From actual movies or just tech demos?
Enter your email address to join: