2) Marion's never ending ^^^^-eating grin bugged the hell out of me. Why did she have such a big smile in so many life-threatening situations?
Because Karen Allen finally had a big acting job again!!!
While I saw and disliked it in two back-to-back viewings, the more I think about, the more I'm warming up to it a little bit.
But here goes with my gripes...
1) The refrigerator - I'm no physicist, but it seems to me that there is NO F'N WAY Indy survived that without a scratch. First of all, there was no padding in there, so he would've been pulverized from the impacts. And if that wasn't unrealistic enough, someone needs to explain to me how Indy wasn't immediately incinerated. Yes, the lead could shield him from the radiation, but wouldn't the lead have become superheated from the heat of the blast????
2) The waterfalls - Not only did they survive unscatched after falling down three massive falls, but they managed to stay either in the craft or just next to it?!?!?!
Seriously, all of the Indy films so far have had stunts that don't require too much of a suspension of disbelief, but that scene was too farfetched!!!
3) The CGI - Absolutely terrible in parts!!! When Mutt and Spalko dueled between vehicles, you could actually see their bodies change shape when the transition to CGI models occurred.
4) Characterization - Yes, this is an older Indy, and I think that angle was played up appropriately. But once Indy and Marion reunited, there were scenes that were completely out-of-character. Both acted like schoolchildren, something that they didn't even do in "Raiders". Marion acted as though she was on too many happy pills, and the spunkiness of "Raiders" Marion was gone. And what was up with Indy's diatribe on quicksand??!! Not only was it done in a really strange voice, but Indy NEVER lectured about something so inconsequential.