Jazzinc Dioramas 1/6 Ultimate Catwoman (Batman Returns, 1992)

[ZE_501]

we will tone down her behind a bit and make a V11 before production

Somebody call @ironwez20 ! This is a crisis!

 

[shadows]

Hmmm. I don't remember her booty being that plump in the movie either.

Wor-Gar please send mind files.

So Peiffer had a flat arse?

 

[ZE_501]

So Peiffer had a flat arse?

I think at the time (if I recall) we were still in the era of 'heroin chic' and super skinny actresses.

How her physique look also likely changed depending on when they were shooting, camera angles, maybe different suits, stunt doubles etc.

While we still have skinny actresses now, there are also more voluptuous, more fit, and/or more thicc versions of the female sex symbol in 2025.

 

[Asta]

So Peiffer had a flat arse?

Pfeiffer's Catwoman is just the warm up act for the main event...

 

[Hologram AI]

She was definitely slimmer on the rear end. Of course it's hard to exactly say when they were using a stunt double or not.

Except for the very obvious head on shots.

 

[Dave_W]

 

[Wor-Gar]

we will tone down her behind a bit and make a V11 before production

Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!!!!!

 

[Wor-Gar]

 

[The Buffinator]

we will tone down her behind a bit and make a V11 before production

 

[The Buffinator]

Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!!!!!

Great minds lol....

 

[The Buffinator]

View attachment 759534

 

[Knedlo]

Well I think its not about the size as much as about the shape, that side view looks great to me, but from the back it looks like she has butt implants. Here I tried to draw the correct size - the butt should be angled at the sides

 

[shadows]

Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!!!!!

Is this where you can't please anyone? Some of us want a nice plump arse (not movie accurate) where some of us want movie accurate arse (me). So it's a dammed if do you dammed if you don't scenario. This is the annoying thing Jazzinc has to face all the time. Just make everything movie accurate is my opinion but either way I'm not too bothered if they give the figure a nice arse.

 

[The Buffinator]

Well I think its not about the size as much as about the shape, that side view looks great to me, but from the back it looks like she has butt implants. Here I tried to draw the correct size - the butt should be angled at the sides
View attachment 759587

So more like this

than this?

 

[The Buffinator]

Is this where you can't please anyone? Some of us want a nice plump arse (not movie accurate) where some of us want movie accurate arse (me). So it's a dammed if do you dammed if you don't scenario. This is the annoying thing Jazzinc has to face all the time. Just make everything movie accurate is my opinion but either way I'm not too bothered if they give the figure a nice arse.

Yeah, I think Joost knows we're just messing around lol...

 

[JazzInc]

So after all your feedback, we toned down the butt. Shortened the neck and even made a silicon test body for the corset. V11 body. What do you think?

 

[shadows]

So after all your feedback, we toned down the butt. Shortened the neck and even made a silicon test body for the corset. V11 body. What do you think?View attachment 759628View attachment 759629View attachment 759630View attachment 759631View attachment 759632

Looks nice

 

[ZE_501]

So after all your feedback, we toned down the butt. Shortened the neck and even made a silicon test body for the corset. V11 body. What do you think?View attachment 759628View attachment 759629View attachment 759630View attachment 759631View attachment 759632

I think that's a perfect rendering. No more need to butt in.

(I'll show myself out.)

 

[Uncle Bingo]

That's looking really good there, absolutely ass-tonishing.

 

[ZE_501]

That's looking really good there, absolutely ass-tonishing.

You know these comments are saved for posterity, right? Did you want to back it up? Or are you saying hell with it, devil take the hindmost?

Not sure how this is all gonna hold up in the rearview. Hindsight is 20/20 after all.