JND Studios: Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade - 1:3 Harrison Ford and Sean Connery

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Some of the best shots so far (screencaps from Virtual Devil's video review).
 

Attachments

  • Indy2.jpg
    Indy2.jpg
    57.3 KB
  • Indy3.jpg
    Indy3.jpg
    85.1 KB
  • Indy4.jpg
    Indy4.jpg
    74.2 KB
If only JND had painted the eyebrows lighter. I will see if there's any way I can do it to make it look like the adjusted eyebrow colour photo on the right.
Just that simple change to the colour makes a MASSIVE amount of difference (at least to the way my eyes perceive the likeness). I'll always remember the interview I saw with one of Madame Tussauds sculptors who made a special point of saying that the eyebrows can be one of the most important features that make or break a likeness. I agree with them.
 

Attachments

  • Indy2 copy.jpg
    Indy2 copy.jpg
    319.1 KB
Last edited:
Some of the best shots so far (screencaps from Virtual Devil's video review).

This is seriously the most baffling release, where it feels like the buyer is taking a punt on what the hell they're going to get - the thickness of his face is these shots looks about right, whereas every other shots or video makes it look too thin. WTF???? I could kind of understand if it was Indy only but whenever Henry is photographed/videod as well - even with lens distortion - the Henry looks good.

I just don't get it (and my job is working with cameras).
 
This is seriously the most baffling release, where it feels like the buyer is taking a punt on what the hell they're going to get - the thickness of his face is these shots looks about right, whereas every other shots or video makes it look too thin. WTF???? I could kind of understand if it was Indy only but whenever Henry is photographed/videod as well - even with lens distortion - the Henry looks good.

I just don't get it (and my job is working with cameras).
If the statue I receive looks like the one Virtual Devil reviewed, my enthusiasm and excitement for changing it to a Raiders version just got invigorated again!
 
This is seriously the most baffling release, where it feels like the buyer is taking a punt on what the hell they're going to get - the thickness of his face is these shots looks about right, whereas every other shots or video makes it look too thin. WTF???? I could kind of understand if it was Indy only but whenever Henry is photographed/videod as well - even with lens distortion - the Henry looks good.

I just don't get it (and my job is working with cameras).
Could it be that photographing these silicone sculpts is just different in the way they absorb the light, etc?

I only have 2 JND statues, but both look so much better in hand and not as warped or funky as some photos make them out to be.
 
Back
Top