Joker: Folie à Deux

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
I can definitely see WB liscencing DC off to other studios but I can't see them outright selling it.

They won’t sell it - it’s one of their main properties. But they certainly as you say will consider wrapping up D.C. films and licensing out on a per property basis

Is it really a F U to the audience, or just a continuation of the delusion theme? Maybe Phillips thought we didn't get the message the first time.

As usual I liked it more than most, but felt Harley could have fought harder when Arthur disowned the persona. After building her life around him, she just shrugged and walked off.

it would be a million times better narratively and in terms of a character study if Harley convinced him that it was ok to be the Joker rather than just accepted and walked away at him accepting he’s just Arthur
 
Did WB not visit the set or what

The studio got what they wanted out of Joker 1, everything else is gravy. Or thin gravy at this point. Joker 1 is proof of life to investors that this concept can succeed as a stand alone franchise. It breached the billion dollar mark. Also it garnered Oscars. And it did so despite immediately backlash from those embedded in the mainstream media trying to kill off the first film. The staying power with international markets though is the real cherry on top.

Even if some folks, even many folks, were not happy and didn't enjoy Joker 2, the overall perception of the franchise by investors is enough to likely/have green light The Authority, Swamp Thing and an Amanda Waller spin off franchise. The doors are now open to a tier of possible casting that wasn't available before. The studio can now cycle through a new Joker trilogy every decade, much like in the vein of Batman or Spiderman. Even if this iteration isn't the Joker some people want, more Joker is coming, even beyond Phillips and Phoenix. And it's because of Phillips and Phoenix that this is possible.

Studios do not want to lose money, but they accept the tradeoffs of the "loss leader" principle. Early Ryan Murphy was a risk for FX. Nip/Tuck was even a bit too far on the edge for them back then. But now look at what he's done for them. He's basically carrying them on his shoulders, in current times, nearly by himself. Any studio will take a financial hit to find the next Ryan Murphy, the next Chuck Lorre, the next **** Wolf, someone who just can churn out relative wins for a studio/network.

Todd Phillips is likely not going to have a **** Wolf kind of longevity for the DCEU. That's unfortunate. Do I wish Joker 2 was structurally more cohesive? Yes. Do I think it's a flawed film? Sure. Did I enjoy it? Yes, but I recognize why many did not. I'm not telling people who hate Joker 2 to magically love it, I am saying if you see a prestige level Swamp Thing film, and you've been waiting a long time for it, it doesn't happen without Philliips/Phoenix and Joker 1. Salvage what "wins", relative as they may be at this point, that you can right now. Am I a huge Swamp Thing fan? No. Am I locked in on The Authority? No. Would I jump for joy to see more Amanda Waller? Not a chance. But others might.

Did I love Dances With Wolves? Not really. Do I kneel at the altar of Kevin Costner? I could care less. But that DID DwW figure with horse set that just came out is only possible because of the success of selling all those WW2 German military figures, over decades, that 95 percent of the fanbase here don't care about at all.

This current Joker franchise opened a lot of new doors before ironically it found a way to close a door on itself. Taking the wins that are still left behind is not some kind of surrender.
 
This is the last DC film without Gunn behind it?

At least the only way is up, right? Right?!?
but-umm.gif


If you say so..
 
We haven’t seen what he can do with Superman yet so no we don’t really know if it’ll be up or down.
 
Is it really a F U to the audience, or just a continuation of the delusion theme? Maybe Phillips thought we didn't get the message the first time.

As usual I liked it more than most, but felt Harley could have fought harder when Arthur disowned the persona. After building her life around him, she just shrugged and walked off.
there was a lot of Harley scenes cut and the ending where she kills joker and becomes lady joker was cut.
so maybe what you mentioned was filmed and cut
 
I like how dc hired two guys that wanted Batman characters to get graped. Weird that happened twice 😂.
I’m scared for krpto in Superman legacy now
 
"Wanna know how I got these scars? So there was this guy. His name was Arthur. He dressed as a clown and called himself joker. He was a little Crazier than usual. I use to watch him on Tv ALLLLLL the time. One day I happened to be in jail with him. One day the guards graped him and he renounced his joker title infront of the whooooollllle world. This made me a little mad see. So I caught him in the hallway one day and stabbed the guy and just cut my face for no reason whatsoever,"

Batman- Um... k.
 
No but anybody who thinks that's Heath joker has to be either a child or just not to bright. Becuase literally Harvey dent was in the damn movie lol
 
In the background out of focus (as Arthur dies in foreground) we see that wonky tooth dude who kills him cutting either side of his mouth/cheek like Heath Joker has.
 
In the background out of focus (as Arthur dies in foreground) we see that wonky tooth dude who kills him cutting either side of his mouth/cheek like Heath Joker has.
Why are people going out of their way to connect that scene to Ledger? Nolan doesn't have Carte blanche on how Joker's scarred smile becomes a thing.

Scar face/deformed Joker is even in The Batman.
 
Back
Top