Jurassic World (SPOILERS!)

[CelticPredator]

Re: Jurassic Park 4

I want to see a T-Rex with a rocket launcher.

And Raptor Jesus.

 

[Wulf]

Re: Jurassic Park 4

Nah thats what I hated about 3. They took the raptor stuff too far IMO. I certainly don't want to see a thinking T-Rex.

Dinosaurs couldn't think!

 

[heon123]

Re: Jurassic Park 4

Last thing i want to see is cgi dinosaurs and another trex dying.

 

[a-dev]

Re: Jurassic Park 4

Last thing i want to see is cgi dinosaurs and another trex dying.

I agree, enough T-Rex have died to bring us these films.

 

[Voorhees27]

Re: Jurassic Park 4

Do we need a Jurassic Park 4? Haven't we seen it all?

Nope. There's still opportunity at rapping gangster dinosaurs. Should be wild.

 

[ExMem-LarjaThwei]

Re: Jurassic Park 4

I wonder what they'll do to make this fresh again.

 

[MaulFan]

Re: Jurassic Park 4

I wonder what they'll do to make this fresh again.

 

[Voorhees27]

Re: Jurassic Park 4

I wonder what they'll do to make this fresh again.

Tons of violence, rap music and boobs.

 

[CelticPredator]

Re: Jurassic Park 4

And Dubstep. Jurassic Park 4 can become the new Die Hard 5.

 

[heon123]

Re: Jurassic Park 4

Im trying to think about what they could possibly write the movie about but its really hard to think about. If they end up doing mutated dinosaurs or something random to kill the series imma gonna go berzerk.

The best idea I came up with is a kind of Jurassic Park where someone has to escape an island filled with much more fierce dinosaurs than before but thats basically JP3 so....

 

[ExMem-LarjaThwei]

Re: Jurassic Park 4

Tons of violence, rap music and boobs.

And Dubstep. Jurassic Park 4 can become the new Die Hard 5.

Sounds more like Piranha 3D.

I read some article not too long ago that stated there was originally going to be a fourth film several years ago where human DNA gets meshed with the Dino DNA causing an outbreak of mutated Dino/human hybrid zombie monsters...ehm..

 

[Ra88]

Re: Jurassic Park 4

Sounds more like Piranha 3D.

I read some article not too long ago that stated there was originally going to be a fourth film several years ago where human DNA gets meshed with the Dino DNA causing an outbreak of mutated Dino/human hybrid zombie monsters...ehm..

That's only half true. There was also a group of mutant comandos that were bred by a super secret European do-gooder to become lasergun wielding super soldiers. I am not even making this **** up.

For anyone who never heard of that before:

https://io9.com/5950364/scrapped-concept-art-from-jurassic-park-4-shows-off-insane-dinosaur-commandos

 

[snoop101]

Re: Jurassic Park 4

With a good director, that could happen.

Great actors are far more important. But a great Director will definitely help.

 

[CelticPredator]

Re: Jurassic Park 4

eh, no.

A bad director can make a good actor seem weak.

A good director can make a bad actor seem good.


Directors are far more important. Look at Terminator Salvation. Bale is a great actor, and was TERRIBLE in that movie.

Channing Tatum is TERRIBLE in ever movie, except for 21 Jump Street (or Magic Mike, haven't seen it....but others say he is). Actors don't just do whatever they want. They have to be directed. And if they're directed poorly, it shows.

 

[a-dev]

Re: Jurassic Park 4

I'd agree there. The SW prequels are another example of good actors delivering $h!te performances because the director just didn't give a damn and was only concerned where the special effects were going.

 

[CelticPredator]

Re: Jurassic Park 4

Great example.

 

[snoop101]

Re: Jurassic Park 4

eh, no.

A bad director can make a good actor seem weak.

A good director can make a bad actor seem good.


Directors are far more important. Look at Terminator Salvation. Bale is a great actor, and was TERRIBLE in that movie.

Channing Tatum is TERRIBLE in ever movie, except for 21 Jump Street (or Magic Mike, haven't seen it....but others say he is). Actors don't just do whatever they want. They have to be directed. And if they're directed poorly, it shows.

Eh, yes.

There have been numerous times where an actor has outshined just an otherwise "okay" movie and made it great. Very rarely can a director compensate and save a movie with garbage actors.

 

[snoop101]

Re: Jurassic Park 4

I'd agree there. The SW prequels are another example of good actors delivering $h!te performances because the director just didn't give a damn and was only concerned where the special effects were going.

Good actors?

You mean like Hayden Christensen?

 

[CelticPredator]

Re: Jurassic Park 4

Eh, yes.

There have been numerous times where an actor has outshined just an otherwise "okay" movie and made it great. Very rarely can a director compensate and save a movie with garbage actors.

No. Sorry, but no. See a good director would not hire garbage actors, and therefore make the entire thing irrelevent.

By the way, Sam Jackson, Ewan McGreggor, and Christopher Lee all sucked in the prequels. Would you not call them great actors?

Bad directing = bad acting/bad actors.

 

[karamazov80]

Re: Jurassic Park 4

I'm also for the super mutant dinosaur monsters. Or, Dino Riders.

That + Jeff Goldblum = Great Success