Hulksmashed
Super Freak
- Joined
- Jun 10, 2008
- Messages
- 2,829
- Reaction score
- 0
Re: The Man of Steel/Nolan's Superman
Nah, Singer's movie wasn't actually a reboot. It was an extension of Superman I and II. Singer basically said that Returns basically just pretended that Superman III and IV never existed. So it wasn't a reboot, but a sequel to I and II. Which is why Brandon Routh was cast to be as close to Reeve as they could get.
I mean, Superman's "Son" in returns was a result of the night that Superman spent with Lois in the Fortress of Solitude in Superman II.
you.....don't think SR is a reboot??? Umm, Singer along with the rest of the free world knew & said that movie was a reboot dude, where the hell you bin hiding?? I had this ultra fancy SR tin DVD that had EVERY FREAKIN SUPERMAN related media in it with the exception of Supergirl.
I mean this collector edt even had this GAWD AWFUL but funny as hell pilot for a musical superman tv show
Any way...in the behind the scenes section Singer clearly points out that he's rebooting the franchise from the Superman's 3&4 that were an utter fiasco. So yeah, its a reboot.
Or should I say......WAS a reboot.
Nah, Singer's movie wasn't actually a reboot. It was an extension of Superman I and II. Singer basically said that Returns basically just pretended that Superman III and IV never existed. So it wasn't a reboot, but a sequel to I and II. Which is why Brandon Routh was cast to be as close to Reeve as they could get.
I mean, Superman's "Son" in returns was a result of the night that Superman spent with Lois in the Fortress of Solitude in Superman II.