I like the Rolling Stones, but... now way. This is a really weird figure to own.
Besides, the Stones suck balls big enough to fit Jaggers lips anyways.
Right. Not like some boring and pretentious Rick Wakeman album.
ok now that I've seen the faces, never mind.
Mick looks like one of thsoe blow-up dolls.
Kind of interesting that someone would even consider doing the Stones as 12" figures, but there are other musicians I'd much rather see done.
Mud, it's also kind of interesting that Martin Scorsese's next picture is a Stones concert film, especially since there've been a few of those made already. Or that there was a photo book about the making of Exile on Main Street just five years ago. It appears many of you guys aren't fans of the Stones, and I think you underestimate their appeal to some of us who scratch our heads at all the Kiss stuff out there. That's fine, but guys, don't mix it up with the execution of the figures.
These are Medicom figures. They will be on RAH bodies, which means they'll be fragile, short (fine in the case of these guys), have ugly neck cuts and wrist posts, and use unpainted flesh-colored vinyl. A lot of us would much rather have seen the Sideshow approach. (And I agree with Abstract, because 1969 would have left the door open to a Brian Jones figure.)
Despite the apparently low interest in our Freaks community, these figures will sell out -- and they'll be $150 like the Pistols, not $100 like Peter Parker. I'd really love it if it prompted Hot Toys to make Morrison, Hendrix, and Joplin.
Not to turn this into another "wish-list", but besides the Beatles (which is happening), I'd like a 1:6 David Bowie. I could see Medicom making one.
Enter your email address to join: