NFL Thread

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
How is Jamie Collins still not playing. Insane. Three weeks now. Plus Amendola is out. Dobson lost for the year. I can't even name four receivers. Lafell, Martin, Harper..... does Slater count?

Still got Gronk though. Already scored! :lol


You can have everybody and their mother missing but as long as Brady is there and Billichick is in charge, Pats will score first.
 
You can have everybody and their mother missing but as long as Brady is there and Billichick is in charge, Pats will score first.

Yeah, just disappointing to see those guys out. At least they will be healthy come playoff time. Pats have an easy schedule and should be able to win enough games to get home field throughout.
 
Yeah, just disappointing to see those guys out. At least they will be healthy come playoff time. Pats have an easy schedule and should be able to win enough games to get home field throughout.

Right now is their remaining challenge, it's still Denver even without Manning.

Either Bengals or Broncos in AFC Championship vs Pats :lecture
 
I thought you were talking about the Sherman INT... that what I get for trying to read this thread on my cell phone.
Nope the INT at the end that shouldn't have been. If anything it's incomplete or a steelers catch. It ends up with simultaneous control and then comes out of all control while on ground out of bounds. How that can be an INT is just one more of those WTF things that happen in that stadium.
 
Nope the INT at the end that shouldn't have been. If anything it's incomplete or a steelers catch. It ends up with simultaneous control and then comes out of all control while on ground out of bounds. How that can be an INT is just one more of those WTF things that happen in that stadium.

Yeah what ever happened to when you tumble out of bounds, you are out and the play doesn't count :slap
 
Nope the INT at the end that shouldn't have been. If anything it's incomplete or a steelers catch. It ends up with simultaneous control and then comes out of all control while on ground out of bounds. How that can be an INT is just one more of those WTF things that happen in that stadium.

That's a WTF moment that happens all the time because there is no defined what is and what isn't a catch. Kam had the ball, hit the ground in bounds, rolled out of bounds was getting up when the Pitt WR knocked it loose and it bounced around.. the Pitt receiver never had possession while in bounds. But oh well. There will never be a right answer because even the NFL can't come up with a right answer. You say no, the replay official says yes, the tv replay guy said no and Phil Simms said yes. Even with this win I don't see Seattle doing much in the playoffs (if they get there.) Their D is WAY to sloppy these days and I don't trust them very much.
 
I say it was an interception, Kam is down by contact in bounds by the tackle attempt the moment his forearm hits the ground with possession of the ball. The knocking out after they're both out of bound stuff shouldn't even factor into the decision because that's like someone scores a touchdown it's called down you walk the ball to the official and the DB knocks the ball out of your hands it should be considered incomplete. what they need to get rid of is the stupid must maintain control crap. You catch the ball, two feet down, knee or forearm hits, that's it play's dead and catch.
 
I say it was an interception, Kam is down by contact in bounds by the tackle attempt the moment his forearm hits the ground with possession of the ball. The knocking out after they're both out of bound stuff shouldn't even factor into the decision because that's like someone scores a touchdown it's called down you walk the ball to the official and the DB knocks the ball out of your hands it should be considered incomplete. what they need to get rid of is the stupid must maintain control crap. You catch the ball, two feet down, knee or forearm hits, that's it play's dead and catch.
No way so I get two hands on the ball with my feet on the ground its a catch? I can lose it one milli second later but still its a catch? They say you have to show control and make a "football move". But if you go to the ground you dont need to show control?
 
Can't believe the Pats/ Texans game in two weeks is actually going to mean something now that Houston is in the WC :horror
 
Back
Top