Official Sideshow Storm Shadow Photo thread

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
I would love to have to a nice 4-5 man squad of Troopers next to the Officer but eventually it would just take up too much room. Especially if/when they get around to CGs, Vipers, or even Snow Serpents :drool So at present I'm going with two troops and an Officer and likely a Sniper.
 
Likely the last time you'll see Snake Eyes for so cheap:

https://supernaturalart.com/detail.aspx?ID=5091

Put him in your cart and he should show up as 30% cheaper, about $75 or so. If you've been on the fence now is time to get off it.

Crap, Gandalf was 30 bucks.... then I tried to add Lando and Gandalf was no longer in my cart.... guess he sold out while I was shopping :huh
 
picture.php


picture.php


picture.php


picture.php


picture.php


picture.php


picture.php


picture.php


picture.php


picture.php
 
Skizor has arrived! :rock2 :rock2



Boba Fett and Flint...Two of the best vintage figures ever. :rock Oh and the Hulk PF ain't bad either.:gun



The lack of Gandalf has me waffling.... I only collect ANH to keep my Star Wars purchases down a little.... But man, "Mr Smoove" is damn cool.

I feel you on that one. Aside from Medicom Fett or Bespin Luke I don't have anyone to put with Lando so I haven't convinced myself to fork over the cash. Lando screams for a better Bespin Han and an ESB Liea to put with him. :dunno
 
Great pic's of your Storm Shadow Skiman. What body is your Snake Eye's on? The both of them look realy cool.
 
Skiman very nice. I'm glad you decided to put an undershirt on Storm Shadow. It looks a lot better doesn't it? I like the action shots a lot I may try some later.
 
This is true. :banghead

But Toy Anxiety is having a Cyber Monday sale tomorrow where you get 20% off a $100 purchase, and they have the Officer in stock. You know you want it. :D

Awesome. Just placed my order for a boxed Officer and a bunch of loose parts for $89!
 
Notice we don't chicken little it though. As far as coupstair's post, it read more like an OMG Sideshow FAIL!!!!:



The use of the word "major" implies that it's crucial. I see it more as a minor oversight, or as most of us see it, a "who the ^^^^ cares," than something that would be considered a "major technical error." Something like that would've been making him a different ethnicity, or not including his ninjato, etc. It's posts like coupstair's that incite the Star Wars douchebags, one of which is lurking already, to start with pointing out all the minuscule bull^^^^ inconsistencies. Let alone the post was made by someone who doesn't even have and most likely won't even buy the figure in the first place.

yikes!! i didn't think such an observation was going to get your particular panties all bunched up so badly! :eek: but you're right it's not a big deal, just an observation from a dude who knows a bit about a bow that's all. as such, as it might trigger a response from someone whom knows something about, say, a sniper rifle and the scope, silencer, etc, of which i know nothing so wouldn't care about an error, i notice the error of the bow handing. :dunno obviously you don't shoot a bow, so you don't care, and that's perfectly fine with me. no need for name calling and trash talking over the web my friend, but i must admit the string of threads created by my comment last month, that i finally took a look at today had me in a fine belly roll. good stuff! funny stuff! TOYS!! and i have 2 of these guys, a reg and an ex, all of the other joes in the line as well, and ... ah, anyways i have so much SSC & WETA stuff i think i've paid for the right to say a thing or 2 if i deem it reasonable, and this small error seemed reasonable enough to mention. cheers to Alice, enjoy, don't mind me ....
 
yikes!! i didn't think such an observation was going to get your particular panties all bunched up so badly! :eek: but you're right it's not a big deal, just an observation from a dude who knows a bit about a bow that's all. as such, as it might trigger a response from someone whom knows something about, say, a sniper rifle and the scope, silencer, etc, of which i know nothing so wouldn't care about an error, i notice the error of the bow handing. :dunno obviously you don't shoot a bow, so you don't care, and that's perfectly fine with me. no need for name calling and trash talking over the web my friend, but i must admit the string of threads created by my comment last month, that i finally took a look at today had me in a fine belly roll. good stuff! funny stuff! TOYS!! and i have 2 of these guys, a reg and an ex, all of the other joes in the line as well, and ... ah, anyways i have so much SSC & WETA stuff i think i've paid for the right to say a thing or 2 if i deem it reasonable, and this small error seemed reasonable enough to mention. cheers to Alice, enjoy, don't mind me ....

WOW... how old is that ****ing post?! Bro, I was over that when the sun set. Talk about pulling stuff out of your culo to start a flame war. But given the whole sobbing schlop above, you even said it's a "small" error, not the "MAJOR TECHNICAL ERROR" you first claimed it was. :lol:rotfl:lol
 
Back
Top