Spent another 2 days at QMx ironing differences. Like I mentioned, I was being confused from my objectives and QMx action since Nov. Now that I know the objective was changed months before Nov. Under this circumstances, my 2 months frustration was not justified.
My objectives are like Starfleet Prime Directive. This obligation is supposed to be clear and measurable. Everything I do and will do must pass this judgement call from this objective statement. QMx objective was in changing phase in the past 2 months, and I didn't know about it. So I created a lot of issue because of this misunderstanding.
I am sorry for posting my wrong frustration on this thread.
I also want to express one more opinion.
I met an stray doggie on the street that no one wants. I took him in, protected him, feed him, taught him what I know, bathe him, bandaged his wound with my care, and have been doing this for last 10 years. The doggie and I went through all the tears and laughter together. Then one day SPCA came and want to take him away for the greater good of the city. They will do the best they can of course but in the event that no one adopt him, he will be exterminated. Am I wrong in preventing SPCA from taking it? Yes, because I am not the legal owner. Is SPCA wrong? No. They are doing their job for the city for a greater good for everyone. But to the doggie, I am protecting him at all cost in inexperienced people's hands.
I am sorry for my action, BUT I am not sorry for my intention to protect 1/6 Trek at all cost.
Many of you know me for the last 10 years. Ask yourself, did Nanjin objective ever changed? For better or worse, I didn't change, I am still the same Nanjin as 10 years ago.