I am against ****** Fake Bootlegs but I could care less who buys them. I do support customs people have done like Franky and jacksdo but I hate straight up copies like Datong. **** them bootlegs.I'm not against "the people" who buys the KO, but I'm an enthusiast who prefer to support the right licensed product. I just agree with @blood statement.
In the end we're all different and think differently, to each his own. Do what makes you happy, not what Blood says haha.
I feel like this goes both ways. But I think the only truly evil people are the people who actually scalped the regular Figuarts. Don't care what it is, that IS pure evil. >___>
I agree with you there.
I read your novella, Sil. Good points.
Interesting to see you take such a stand Blood, but you make a crucial mistake. I agree regarding bootlegs, and you know that (you memed me once because of it lol), but I disagree regarding frankie and customisers. Copyright is a good thing at its core, but they're rules, and rules never entail the nuance of the situation in practice. If Frankie starts having a big company and whole selling his stuff, yeah then it becomes something else to talk about, but handcrafted effects stuff? Come on. That anime producing argument doesn't hold up at all for someone who handcrafts because their business isn't even enough to live off, let alone make any significant license money. Beyond that I doubt what Frankie makes is or can be copyrighted, besides the names. (And I haven't bought anything from him btw.) Then there's a completely opposite side to it: if anything he HELPS SELL figuarts, because he is in fact PROMOTING their products via his own work. Did you think about that? He makes NEW handcrafted items that actually promote these figures, because they're useless without them. You're not okay with that? Really? Because of a few cents he doesn't pay in licensing things that aren't even characters!?
Moreover, earning from something made off or for something else someone made without paying them licensing money directly is NOT innately wrong, in fact we do it everyday. The computer is the best modern day example of that. People make something new with existing artefacts of others constantly, that's how we innovate technologically and enable new creativity. The point is whether you're actually COPYING someone, hence the name copyright. And there lies a mistake you make: manycustomisers DO pay licensing fees, because they actually have to buy the original figure first. That is why it isn't copying; it's creating something new out of something existing that you paid for to a licensor, and almost every more complicated product around has an element of that. As far as I know with material products that is entirely legal and both rightly and thank to god so – it's what enables technological and artistic advancement in society. When you buy an Apple computer you buy intel chips. Apple bought those chips from intel to sell them in their new design. that is exactly what a customiser does: they buy official material, do their own thing with it (with other materials all paid for we're gonna assume), and sell it. That's legal and in my eyes entirely moral, especially because in doing so both parties help each other. (Their asking price is something else... Different topic.) And the legality and morality of that regarding non-material products, including intellectual property, is also definitely not black and white. Take sampling in music: is a lot of hip hop evil now? No, it's not, but even you wanna argue that, it's a very grey thing. It's assimilating previously made things – hopefully its parts paid for via a legit outlet – to make new things. That's the corner stone of artificial progression. That's what our society's advancement is based upon. That includes intellectual property as well.
Jacksdo does also fall into that grey area. Although they don't just create something new, they actually copy too: they copy a design. And they mass manufacture to my knowledge too. So that does make grey on the side of black rather than white for me.
Nonetheless, copying and assimilating are two different things, practically, morally and legally. I agree with you regarding the knockoffs and more than I realised admittedly also regarding jacksdo, but not people who make new stuff handcrafted from scratch and have a small operation, nor customisers who had to buy the initial licensed material. You're mistaken if you equate that to bootlegging. Practically, principally and legally, it's not the same, and carries positive elements that you seemingly overlook... EDIT: Mainly the promotional element of both the product it ties to as well as the intellectual property.
I feel like this goes both ways. But I think the only truly evil people are the people who actually scalped the regular Figuarts. Don't care what it is, that IS pure evil. >___>
Hotei is sorta right though, a lot of things exist to sell toys. How do you guys think we got Batman and Robin?
you've seen my collection. i own alot of unlicensed masks. but it's because i know that the guy who makes it started with making michael myers masks for himself. because there was no market for that. so he had no other option but to learn how to make it himself and it all grew from there. like i said before i am just as ugly. i own stuff purely because i only care about my collection.
Enter your email address to join: