Captain Britain
Super Freak
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2008
- Messages
- 3,596
- Reaction score
- 6
Until the Edward Scissorhands figure came along I had no idea Hot Toys made figures based on specific licenses when they didn't have the image likeness rights. Should they be doing it? My feelings are really divided about this - on the one hand, I say no, because an accurate likeness is one of the most important things to me about any figure. On the other hand, I love the 2 in 1 Hot Toys Superman - best Superman figure ever, even if it looks nothing like Brandon Routh.
But Scissorhands just leaves me cold because the Depp likeness isn't there. I guess it depends on the individual character - if they did a Nolan Batman with a likeness that wasn't Bale's it wouldn't bother me, 'cause although I like Bale's performance it's not up there for me with the greatest performances ever. But if they did a Reeve Superman where the likeness was only a partial resemblance then that would piss me off.
It's not like they charge any less where they haven't managed to get the likeness rights, which is perhaps the real issue - they should, shouldn't they?
But Scissorhands just leaves me cold because the Depp likeness isn't there. I guess it depends on the individual character - if they did a Nolan Batman with a likeness that wasn't Bale's it wouldn't bother me, 'cause although I like Bale's performance it's not up there for me with the greatest performances ever. But if they did a Reeve Superman where the likeness was only a partial resemblance then that would piss me off.
It's not like they charge any less where they haven't managed to get the likeness rights, which is perhaps the real issue - they should, shouldn't they?