Overall quality is a step up, but aside from the hookah and some slight paint, the thrones look on par with each other.
The original Jabba has the better sculpt, if you could compare the two with identical paint jobs, that would stand out more, but the new one is so much better painted it makes it hard to see it as lesser unless you’re abnormally attuned to the look of Jabba from Jedi to spot the fine areas where the new one is off and subsequently find it unappealing for that.
Yeah, and it's interesting they felt the need to do a side-by-side with the original Jabba. You have to wonder - why on earth would they do that? Go to the trouble of taking a 10+ year old product out of storage to show it?
Simple: Because SSC has noticed the comments (which are not just here) that the old Jabba sculpt is better than the new one. So they bring it out to let that bad 2007 paint sit right next to new, hand-applied prototype paint... proto paint that nobody will actually get.
Sculpt-wise, the new Jabba
does look better from that low angle they filmed it from in that video (their camera is almost at throne level) and they were wise to choose the open mouth and spread out arms, because they look way better than the other mouth/arm options. Less like an animated series Jabba, as it appears in the website pics. The lower resolution of live video also hides the face seams - which they say they can hide in production, but in fact they made it worse on the production Tauntaun (though that was polystone.) Despite what he says, even with the closer PVC vs. 3D print tolerances and material "give," the seams
will be visible - it's just a matter of how much.
And the host guy saying the original Jabba is too small? If you set aside the fact the new throne has a 3/4" insert riser below, and the fact v.2 Jabba has a straight tail (creating the illusion of him "appearing" larger overall) the height is an open question because SSC lists the new Jabba's height as 13 1/4", which is laughably too tall and an error (I think they have depth and height mixed up.) In most onscreen pics, Jabba appears to average about 5'-6" height (it varies, he's sometimes more slumped or stretched up,) which would make him him around 11" in 1/6 - the original SSC Jabba is about 10 3/4", so only about 1/4" undersized.
Sideshow's own track record proves this piece is risky as a PO. Look at a disaster like Red Five Luke - head went from an amazing HT-quality sculpt/apps piece in proto to something from Hasbro in production - loss of sculpt detail and huge drop in paint quality. The recent re-release of IG-88 - disastrous paint, step down from v.1. Dengar's face/eyes and weathering - fine, but a noticeable step down from the proto.
I like the concept of everything they've done here and the LOVE the ambition and commitment to 1/6, but people contemplating a PO need to think about what will this piece look like with noticeable gaps, less sharp sculpt and noticeably weaker production paint. This isn't hate, its solely based on what SSC has delivered in the past few years.