Maybe I should make a bet with myself? Like, if the Rams win today I will buy Jabba... if they lose I will not.
Could make the game very interesting.
Could make the game very interesting.
Minnesota.
I don’t care that this is a statue. I mean frankly I don’t really know how else you make Jabba.That's true.
I don't understand the "statue" argument other than as a way to justify NOT getting this I guess. I mean, the original Jabba hardly qualifies as an action figure. So it had twistable arms -- with very little range of motion due to his girth. Is that really where the line is drawn? Old Jabba is an action figure where this new one is not? I'd say old Jabba was basically a statue with partially moving arms. I don't know where the dividing line is but 2007 Jabba must be straddling it.
As far as "action" figure goes, I'd say this new "statue" has a lot more posing options that old Jabba ever could.
I can’t really say I agree with this sentiment personally. Is this Jabba a nice piece? Definitely, but I still would prefer having three other figures filling out my display than missing this one piece that I’d have to pay out the *** for and dedicate a large space to.
The other thing with Jabba is that as great as this figure is I almost feel like it needs accompanying pieces to complete the setup (Bib, Gammorean Guards, etc.). I’d still get this if it was more affordable and I had the space, but I think there’s good reasons for a lot of people to pass on it in favor of other figures.
My birthday is coming up. May use that as a reason to self-indulge in the purchase of the giant slug.
Plus as far as huge purchases go this year, I'm already committed to a Landspeeder, a Vrataski exosuit, and the Prime1 Ultimate WW, and just don't think I could squeeze in another. Even though it does look really damn cool.
A fellow Minnesotan? Who knew.
That's true.
I don't understand the "statue" argument other than as a way to justify NOT getting this I guess. I mean, the original Jabba hardly qualifies as an action figure. So it had twistable arms -- with very little range of motion due to his girth. Is that really where the line is drawn? Old Jabba is an action figure where this new one is not? I'd say old Jabba was basically a statue with partially moving arms. I don't know where the dividing line is but 2007 Jabba must be straddling it.
As far as "action" figure goes, I'd say this new "statue" has a lot more posing options that old Jabba ever could.
Cheers Khev
Officially I live in Iowa, but the main office of the company I work for is in MSP and I have a lot of friends and family there so I spend a lot of time in the Cities.
Nice! Well let me know the next time you're in town and we can bust out our TLJ Luke Skywalker figures while we watch it on blu-ray.
Maybe I should make a bet with myself? Like, if the Rams win today I will buy Jabba... if they lose I will not.
Could make the game very interesting.
I don't think this Jabba really needed any more poseability that it has now, but I do agree HT probably would have taken the level of detail up a notch, especially with their more realistic and translucent skin texture. But then it would also cost an extra $300 probably.
And also the fact they're just never going to make one.
I'm afraid you should bet the opposite if you want the mighty Jabba in your collection
Enter your email address to join: