spindrift
Super Freak
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2009
- Messages
- 13,358
- Reaction score
- 140
Definitely not a parody in it's first season, which was brilliant. As others may have pointed out, the '66 television series (first season especially) was pretty much doing a straight forward adaptation of the Batman comics of golden and silver age era. I think the show did become a full blown parody of itself by the third season. Batman was really only serious for about the first year of his comic book history until O'Neil and Adams sort of turned the thing on it's head in 1970. I agree with what you said about Nolan's trilogy. They are among the best Batman films, but they don't exactly have the best portrayal of the Batman character himself. Bale's Batman really conveys a lot of weakness and doubt. West is far closer the character Bill Finger was writing in those comics of the 40s' and 50s'.
Yep first season had a better tone and took things more straightforward- by the time they made the Batman movie in between first two seasons extreme camp was creeping in. The third season was awful but saved bu Batgirl