Down goes the value of GG babydoll.
Doubt it would be much. People prefer sculpt 1:4 over cloth.
that's what i feel, it's not just that it's not an accurate potrait of emily, it's also somewhat cartoonish. sideshow has done too many comic book ladies and very rarely a realistic one, and it shows. to me this pf looks like it belongs to the marvel ladies comiquette/pf line. GG on the other has more experience with sculpting realistic ladies, and some turned out great(slave leia comes to mind).More Sucker Punch is always welcome!
Pose and costume detail should be interesting when the reveal comes up. I'm not a fan of Sideshow's face sculpt based on this preview though. The eyes and eyebrows particularly are very cartoonish and look more like they belong on a Lara Croft statue. GG got much closer with their digitally-scanned features, and all it would take to make their Baby Doll look utterly dead-on for Emily is a subtle makeover.
Crazy eye syndrome is always a worry with Sideshow too, so fingers crossed the HK factory gets it right with this one.
Whoa! April is still a good 4 months away!! What was SS thinking?
I'm going on vacation
Though true for a lot of the film, I'd have to disagree that she never had distinct angry expressions at all during the movie. There were occasions...
Doubt it would be much. People prefer sculpt 1:4 over cloth.
She has eyes?
Sculpt 1:4 is so last year.
I'm going on vacation
Dave's banning you in April?
Not the I'm aware of, but that's not the worst idea I've heard today.
Who me? No way. I even had a fellow freak send me some dirty pictures via text message
All is well my friend
Enter your email address to join: